首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >Silvicultural options for rehabilitating high-graded mixedwood stands in northeastern North America
【24h】

Silvicultural options for rehabilitating high-graded mixedwood stands in northeastern North America

机译:在北美东北部康复高级山脉的造林选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In northeastern North America, mixed hardwood-conifer forests have commonly been harvested with selective practices such as diameter-limit cutting. By removing trees of highest commercial value, these cuts often left stands with highly variable density and reduced volume, less species diversity, and lower wood quality. The lack of care to the regenerating layer also resulted in regeneration deficiencies, especially on productive sites supporting yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britton)-conifer stands. We assessed the 15-yr effects of four rehabilitation scenarios on stand growth, quality, vigor and regeneration in an experiment established in Quebec, Canada. The trial compared untreated experimental units (e.g. control), uniform shelterwood method (50 overstory trees/ha), strip clearcutting (20-m strips), and seed-tree method (10 overstory trees/ha), all combined with 3 site preparation treatments (no scarification, mechanical raking, and spot scarification). After 15 years, the ongoing recovery of growth, vigor and regeneration in the control and untreated part of the strip clearcut plot reflected the resilient nature of these mixedwood stands, with conifer (Abies balsamea [L.] Mill., Picea rubens Sarg., Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) saplings and poles contributing to the recovery of total BA and that of vigorous trees (i.e. acceptable growing stock [AGS]). The control and strip clearcut treatments, however, had high BA of unacceptable growing stock. Shelterwood plots recovered more slowly in BA and AGS, but had greater BA of high-quality trees than the control. Seed-tree method was less optimal because of its slow recovery and high understory competition. The lack of synchronization with a good seed year limited the efficiency of scarification, and increased the abundance of non-commercial species. An active rehabilitation strategy combining shelterwood system and ground disturbance (e.g. raking) during a good seed year should help to improve stand quality and regeneration. Yet, our results indicate that retaining conifers in the understory and overstory would ensure a seed source and accelerate recovery. Where seed sources and conifer advance regeneration are lacking, enrichment planting may be necessary to maintain a mixedwood composition over time.
机译:在北美东北北美,混合硬木 - 针叶树林通常被收获,选择性实践,如直径限制切割。通过去除最高商业价值的树木,这些切口通常留下具有高度可变的密度和减少的体积,物种多样性和较低的木质质量。缺乏对再生层的护理也导致再生缺陷,尤其是支持黄桦(Betula Alleghaniensis Britton) - 基金属站的生产基地。我们评估了在加拿大魁北克省魁北克省成立的实验中进行的四种康复情景的15年康复情景。该试验比较未处理的实验单元(例如,对照),均匀的避难木法(50次疏散树木/公顷),条带清除(20-m条)和种子树法(10种疏散树木/公顷),所有联合3个现场准备治疗(无划痕,机械耙和斑点划痕)。在15年后,在剥离清除情节的控制和未经处理的部分的增长,活力和再生的持续恢复反映了这些混合木材的弹性本质,用针叶树(Abies Balsamea [L.]磨坊。,Picea Rubens Sarg。, Picea glauca [Moench] voss)树苗和杆子有助于恢复BA的恢复以及剧烈的树木(即可接受的生长库存[AGS])。然而,控制和条带清除处理具有不可接受的生长股的高级植物。避难木块在BA和AGS中恢复得更慢,但高品质的树木比控制更大。由于其缓慢恢复和高林竞争,种子树方法不太优化。缺乏与良好的种子年同步限制划痕的效率,并增加了非商业物种的丰富。在良好的种子年份结合避难所系统和地面干扰(例如耙)的积极康复策略应该有助于提高立场和再生。然而,我们的结果表明,林下和过度覆盖中的保留针叶将确保种子来源并加速恢复。如果缺乏种子来源和针叶树预先再生,可能需要随时间保持混合木材组合物需要富集种植。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号