...
首页> 外文期刊>Geophysical Research Letters >Assessing Gauge Undercatch Correction in Arctic Basins in Light of GRACE Observations
【24h】

Assessing Gauge Undercatch Correction in Arctic Basins in Light of GRACE Observations

机译:鉴于恩典观测,评估北极盆地中的衡量标折正

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Precipitation measurements at gauges are often considered as reference truth for evaluation of satellite precipitation products. However, gauges may contain large errors. A major source of gauge-measurement error is snowfall undercatch in high latitudes. We show that the two popular correction factors (CFs) used in the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre monitoring and the Global Precipitation Climatology Project products are different by more than 50%. The CFs can be as large as 3; thus, the choice of CF introduces large uncertainties. Here, in light of observation of storage change from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and by using the mass conservation principle, we assess the two popular CFs over six Arctic basins. By investigating monthly time series and multiyear precipitation rates over the studied basins using GRACE-based analysis, the CF based on Fuchs dynamic correction model used in Global Precipitation Climatology Centre monitoring is preferred.
机译:测量仪的降水测量通常被认为是评估卫星沉淀产品的参考真理。 但是,仪表可能包含大错误。 测量误差的主要来源是高纬度的降雪损失。 我们表明,在全球降水中心监测和全球降水气候学项目产品中使用的两种流行矫正因子(CFS)不同的50%以上。 CFS可以大至3; 因此,CF的选择引入了大的不确定性。 在这里,鉴于从重力恢复和气候实验(Grace)的储存变化的观察和通过使用大规模保护原理,我们评估了六个北极盆地的两个受欢迎的CFS。 通过使用Grace的分析调查研究的每月时间序列和多年级降水率,优选基于全球降水中心监测的FUCHS动态校正模型的CF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号