...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Comparison of variable selection techniques for data envelopment analysis in a retail bank
【24h】

Comparison of variable selection techniques for data envelopment analysis in a retail bank

机译:零售银行数据包络分析可变选择技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

If there are too few units compared to inputs and outputs, the efficiency evaluation based upon the data envelopment analysis suffers from a lack of discrimination. The literature has proposed various statistical techniques when the value judgments do not guide the selection of the inputs/outputs. Two techniques, the variable reduction procedure of Jenkins and Anderson (2003) and the approach based upon the efficiency contribution measure of Pastor, Ruiz, and Sirvent (2002), were compared in an empirical retail bank context. The objective was to select a representative set of outputs from the services the bank provides. As the techniques take different approaches to selecting influential variables, the output sets proposed by the techniques diverged. This created some significant differences in the efficiency evaluations of the bank branches. The bank management gave feedback on the techniques and the results from a practical perspective. The techniques led to different managerial interpretations of the performance complementing each other. Thus, the techniques can be utilized to evaluate the units from multiple perspectives. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:如果与输入和输出相比过多的单位,基于数据包络分析的效率评估缺乏歧视。当值判断不引导输入/输出的选择时,文献提出了各种统计技术。在经验零售银行背景下比较了两种技术,詹金斯和安德森(2003)的可变减少程序和基于牧师,鲁伊宗和SIRVENT(2002)的效率贡献措施的方法。目标是从银行提供的服务中选择一组代表性的产出。由于技术采用不同的方法来选择有影响性变量,所以通过技术提出的输出集发散。这在银行分支机构的效率评估中产生了一些显着差异。银行管理从实际角度提出了关于技术的反馈和结果。该技术导致了对互相补充的性能的不同管理解释。因此,可以利用这些技术从多个透视图评估单位。 (c)2016 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号