首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Liability cost sharing, product quality choice, and coordination in two-echelon supply chains
【24h】

Liability cost sharing, product quality choice, and coordination in two-echelon supply chains

机译:责任成本共享,产品质量选择,以及双梯旋塞链中的协调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We consider a two-echelon supply chain in which an upstream manufacturer (M) and a downstream retailer (R) share the product liability cost caused by quality defects. We assume that M and R share the expected liability cost per unit of the low-quality product (the ULQ liability cost). We use two respective Stackelberg games to model two different channel leadership structures: the manufacturer-led Stackelberg (MS) and the retailer-led Stackelberg (RS). We first obtain the analytical subgame perfect equilibria for the games. Subsequently, we investigate the impacts of the ULQ liability cost sharing on the product quality and the pricing decisions and on the profitability for supply chain members and the entire supply chain in equilibrium. We find that (1) in response to a shift of the share of the ULQ liability cost from R to M, the leader M under the MS structure is able to use a higher wholesale price to transfer its increased ULQ liability cost completely to R without the need to improve its product quality, while the leader R under the RS structure would decrease its retail margin to incentivize M to improve its product quality; (2) such a shift of the ULQ liability cost sharing does not have any impact on the supply chain efficiency under the MS structure, but it enhances the supply chain efficiency under the RS structure; (3) despite the different responses of the leaders under the MS and the RS structures, we are able to establish a same set of contracts combining quantity discounts with quality improvement cost sharing to coordinate the supply chain, regardless of the channel leadership structures. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们考虑一个两阶段供应链,其中上游制造商(M)和下游零售商(R)共享所引起的质量缺陷产品责任成本。我们假定M和R份额每低质量的产物(ULQ责任成本)的单元中的预期责任成本。我们用两个各自斯坦博格游戏两种不同的渠道领导结构模式:制造商主导的斯坦博格(MS)和零售商主导的斯坦博格(RS)。我们首先得到比赛的分析子博弈完美均衡。随后,我们调查的ULQ责任分担费用对产品质量和定价决定和对盈利能力的供应链成员和平衡整个供应链的影响。我们发现,在响应于从R至M的ULQ责任成本的份额的移位(1),则MS结构下的领导者M是能够使用更高的批发价格,而不会完全转移其增加ULQ责任成本至R以提高产品质量的同时,RS结构下的领导者R.将降低其零售利润来激励M至提高产品质量的需要; (2)的ULQ责任成本分摊这种转变不会对所述MS结构下的供应链效率的任何影响,但它增强了RS结构下的供应链效率; (3)尽管领导的MS和RS结构下的不同反应,我们能够建立一套相同数量折扣与质量改进的成本分担相结合,协调供应链,不管信道领导结构的合同。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号