首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Supply location and transportation planning for hurricanes: A two-stage stochastic programming framework
【24h】

Supply location and transportation planning for hurricanes: A two-stage stochastic programming framework

机译:供应位置和运输规划飓风:一个两阶段随机编程框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We develop a two-stage stochastic programming model with recourse actions for hurricane preparedness. In the first stage, it works to optimize the locations of Points of Distribution (PODs), medical supply levels, and transportation capacity, and in the second, transportation decisions or flow. Our model minimizes the total social cost, comprised of deprivation and commercial logistics costs. Contrary to the extant literature, which typically employs robust optimization, we use probability distributions to avoid overly conservative estimates of hurricane impact. Additionally, our model facilitates the determination of optimal deployment time. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach in a case study. As risk attitude goes from optimistic to pessimistic, decision makers increase the number of PODs exponentially to spread the risk around. A similar trend holds for total costs as a function of hurricane category and its interplay with risk. Further, for lower strength hurricanes, regardless of risk attitude, the optimal decision is to deploy closer to landfall at 12 hours; for higher strength hurricanes, resources are best deployed earlier, at 36 hours, based on an exponential increase in demand for medical supplies. Deployment cost also increases exponentially as landfall approaches. These costs outweigh deprivation savings from an accurate demand estimate closer to landfall. However, when budget is limited, risk attitude is found to influence deployment decisions and a funding preference for lower severity-level supplies. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们开发了一个两阶段随机规划模型与飓风应对追索行动。在第一阶段,它工作以优化分布的点(POD中),医疗供应水平,和运输能力的位置,并且在第二,运输决定或流动。我们的模式最大限度地减少了社会总成本,包括剥夺和商业物流成本。相反,现存文献,其通常采用鲁棒优化,我们用概率分布,以避免飓风影响过于保守的估计。此外,我们的模型有利于优化部署时间的确定。我们证明了我们在案例研究方法的好处。随着风险的态度从乐观到悲观的推移,决策者增加豆荚数量呈指数围绕分散风险。类似的趋势适用于总成本为飓风类别的功能及其与风险的相互作用。此外,低强度的飓风,无论风险的态度,最优决策是12小时部署接近登陆;更高强度的飓风,资源最好早部署,在36个小时,基于在医疗用品需求的指数级增长。作为登陆接近部署成本也成倍增加。这些成本超过剥夺储蓄从一个准确的需求预测更接近登陆。然而,当预算有限,风险偏好被发现影响部署决策和严重程度较低级别用品的资金偏好。 (c)2018年elestvier b.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号