...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science and Pollution Research >Understanding boosting selenium accumulation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) following foliar selenium application at different stages, forms, and doses
【24h】

Understanding boosting selenium accumulation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) following foliar selenium application at different stages, forms, and doses

机译:理解在不同阶段,形式和剂量下叶面硒施用之后促进小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)中的硒积累

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There are a lack of systematic studies comparing the effects of foliar-applied selenium (Se) with different Se sources at different growth stages in wheat. Herein, we biofortified wheat via the foliar application of selenite and selenate at different rates and different stages under field conditions. Results showed that foliar-applied selenate and selenite had no significant effect either on wheat biomass or grain yield (p < 0.05). Selenium distribution in different parts of wheat plant ranked decrease as leaf > root > grain > glume > stem with selenite treatment, and it appeared in the decline order as leaf > grain > glume > stem > root with selenate treatment. These results suggested that biofortification with selenate caused, relatively to selenite, a higher accumulation of Se in grains. Foliar application of Se of either selenate or selenite at pre-filling stage was superior in improving the Se concentration of wheat grains than application at pre-flowering stage. Meanwhile, organic Se comprised about 72–93% of total Se in wheat grains, which was reduced by 5.8% at high Se rate (100 g ha?1), irrespective of the forms of Se or stages applied. The organic Se proportion in wheat grains was 9% higher with the selenate treatment than with the selenite treatment. Selenomethionine (SeMet) was the main organic species (67–86%) in wheat grains, followed by selenocysteine (SeCys2). In summary, our results indicate that Se biofortification of wheat is most effective with 20 g ha?1 selenate foliar-applied at pre-filling stage.
机译:缺乏系统的研究比较了叶面施用的硒(SE)在小麦不同生长阶段的不同SE源的影响。在此,我们通过在不同速率和不同阶段的裂缝和硒酸盐在现场条件下施用生物塑化小麦。结果表明,叶面施用的硒酸盐和硒酸盐在小麦生物量或籽粒产量上没有显着影响(P <0.05)。硒分布在小麦植物的不同部分中,作为叶片>根>谷物>灌注液>茎秆溶液>晶体处理,它出现在叶片>谷物>茎>茎>根茎用硒化物处理。这些结果表明,硒酸盐的生物侵入,相对于硒酸盐,粒子中的粒度较高。在预填充阶段的硒酸盐或硒矿的叶面施用优异地改善小麦颗粒的SE浓度而不是在开花阶段的应用。同时,有机Se在小麦颗粒中包含约72-93%的总Se,其在高SE速率(100g ha = 1)下减少5.8%,而不管施用的SE或阶段的形式如何。小麦颗粒中的有机SE比例随硒处理比硒矿床处理较高。 Selenomethionine(SELET)是小麦颗粒中的主要有机物质(67-86%),其次是硒细胞(SECYS2)。总之,我们的结果表明,小麦的生物化效果最有效地用20g HA?1亚硒酸裂缝涂抹在预填充阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号