...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Navvus FFR to reduce CONTRAst, Cost and radiaTion (CONTRACT); insights from a single-centre clinical and economical evaluation with the RXi Rapid-Exchange FFR device
【24h】

Navvus FFR to reduce CONTRAst, Cost and radiaTion (CONTRACT); insights from a single-centre clinical and economical evaluation with the RXi Rapid-Exchange FFR device

机译:Navvus FFR减少对比度,成本和辐射(合同); 与RXI快速交换FFR设备的单中心临床和经济评估的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives To assess whether the RXi Navvus system compared to the use of standard Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) wires reduces total contrast volume, radiation and overall study cost in a real world patient population referred for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Background FFR is the mainstay of functional hemodynamic assessment of coronary artery lesions. The RXi Navvus system (ACIST Medical Systems, Eden Prairie, MN) is a monorail microcatheter with FFR-measurement capability through optical pressure sensor technology. Methods This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, observational cohort study. A total of 238 patients were enrolled, 97 patients with Navvus and 141 with conventional pressure-wire based FFR (PW-FFR). Final analyses were performed on the cohort in which only 1 device was used (82 Navvus procedures vs. 136 PW-FFR procedures). Results No significant differences were found in the total amount of contrast used (150 ?77 vs 147 ?79 ml; p = 0.81), radiation use (6200 ?4601 vs. 5076 ?4655 centiG cm2; p = 0.09) or costs (?994,- vs. ?930,-; p = 0.32) in the Navvus vs. PW-FFR groups respectively. Conclusions No significant differences were found in the amount of contrast used, total procedural costs or radiation when the Navvus system was used as compared to conventional FFR wires. Condensed abstract CONTRACT is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, observational cohort study that evaluated whether the RXi Navvus system compared to the use of standard Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) wires reduces total contrast volume, radiation and overall study cost in a real world patient population referred for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Use of the RXi Navvus system was associated with comparable procedural costs, amount of radiation and contrast used as compared to PW-FFR systems.
机译:目的是评估RXI Navvus系统是否与使用标准分数流量储备(FFR)线相比,在冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入的真实世界患者人口中降低了总对比度,辐射和整体研究成本。背景FFR是冠状动脉病变的功能性血液动力学评估的主流性。 RXI Navvus系统(Acist Medical Systems,Eden Prairie,Mn)是一种通过光学压力传感器技术具有FFR测量功能的单轨微大学。方法是调查员启动,前瞻性,单中心,观察队列研究。共注册了238名患者,97例Navvus和141名患者,具有常规的压力线FFR(PW-FFR)。对群组进行最终分析,其中仅使用1个装置(82个Navvus程序与136 PW-FFR程序)。结果在使用的对比度中没有发现显着差异(150?77 Vs 147?79 ml; p = 0.81),辐射使用(6200?4601与5076?4655厘厘米; p = 0.09)或成本(?在Navvus与PW-FFR组中,994, - 与α930, - ; p = 0.32)。结论在与传统FFR电线相比使用Navvus系统时,在使用的对比度,总程序成本或辐射中没有发现显着差异。浓缩的抽象合同是一个调查员启动的,前瞻性,单中心,观察队列研究,评估了RXI Navvus系统是否与使用标准分数流量储备(FFR)电线相比,降低了对比度总量,辐射和整体研究成本现实世界患者患者提到冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入。使用RXI Navvus系统与可比的程序成本相关,与PW-FFR系统相比使用的辐射量和对比度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号