...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurophysiology >Desensitization-resistant and -sensitive GPCR-mediated inhibition of GABA release occurs by Ca2+-dependent and -independent mechanisms at a hypothalamic synapse
【24h】

Desensitization-resistant and -sensitive GPCR-mediated inhibition of GABA release occurs by Ca2+-dependent and -independent mechanisms at a hypothalamic synapse

机译:在下丘脑突触中,Ca2 +依赖性和非依赖性机制发生了抗脱敏和敏感的GPCR介导的GABA释放抑制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Whereas the activation of G alpha(i/o) coupled receptors commonly results in postsynaptic responses that show acute desensitization, the presynaptic inhibition of transmitter release caused by many G alpha(i/o)-coupled receptors is maintained during agonist exposure. However, an exception has been noted where GABA(B) receptor (GABA(B)R)-mediated inhibition of inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) recorded in mouse proopiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons exhibit acute desensitization in similar to 25% of experiments. To determine whether differential effector coupling confers sensitivity to desensitization, voltage-clamp recordings were made from POMC neurons to compare the mechanism by which mu-opioid receptors (MORs) and GABA(B)Rs inhibit transmitter release. Neither MOR-nor GABA(B)R-mediated inhibition of release relied on the activation of presynaptic K+ channels. Both receptors maintained the ability to inhibit release in the absence of external Ca2+ or in the presence of ionomycin-induced Ca2+ influx, indicating that inhibition of release can occur through a Ca2+ independent mechanism. Replacing Ca2+ with Sr2+ to disrupt G-protein-mediated inhibition of release occurring directly at the release machinery did not alter MOR-or GABA(B) -mediated inhibition of IPSCs, suggesting that reductions in evoked release can occur through the inhibition of Ca2+ channels. Additionally, both receptors inhibited evoked IPSCs in the presence of selective blockers of N-or P/Q-type Ca2+ channels. Altogether, the results show that MORs and GABA(B)Rs can inhibit transmitter release through the inhibition of calcium influx and by direct actions at the release machinery. Furthermore, since both the desensitizing and nondesensitizing presynaptic receptors are similarly coupled, differential effector coupling is unlikely responsible for differential desensitization of the inhibition of release.
机译:尽管G alpha(i / o)偶联受体的激活通常会导致突触后反应,表现出急性脱敏,但在激动剂暴露期间,突触前抑制由许多G alpha(i / o)偶联受体引起的递质释放仍被保持。但是,已经注意到一个例外,其中GABA(B)受体(GABA(B)R)介导的小鼠原皮黑素皮质激素(POMC)神经元中抑制性突触后电流(IPSC)的抑制表现出急性脱敏,类似于25%的实验。为了确定差异效应子偶联是否赋予脱敏敏感性,从POMC神经元进行了电压钳记录,以比较mu阿片受体(MOR)和GABA(B)R抑制递质释放的机制。 MOR-或GABA(B)R介导的释放抑制均不依赖突触前K +通道的激活。在没有外部Ca2 +的情况下或在离子霉素诱导的Ca2 +涌入的情况下,这两种受体都保持了抑制释放的能力,这表明释放的抑制可以通过Ca2 +独立的机制发生。用Sr2 +取代Ca2 +以破坏直接在释放机构上发生的G蛋白介导的释放抑制并没有改变MOR-或GABA(B)介导的IPSC抑制,这表明诱发的释放减少可以通过抑制Ca2 +通道发生。此外,在存在N或P / Q型Ca2 +通道选择性阻滞剂的情况下,两种受体均抑制了诱发的IPSC。总而言之,结果表明,MORs和GABA(B)Rs可以通过抑制钙流入和通过在释放机制上的直接作用来抑制递质释放。此外,由于脱敏和非脱敏突触前受体均相似地偶联,所以差异效应子偶联不太可能引起释放抑制的差异脱敏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号