...
首页> 外文期刊>Current directions in psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >The Self and Science: Is It Time for a New Approach to the Study of Human Experience?
【24h】

The Self and Science: Is It Time for a New Approach to the Study of Human Experience?

机译:自我与科学:是时候采用一种新的人类经验研究方法了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, I have three goals. First, I argue that the self, a concept whose tremendous utility for psychological theory is matched by its absence of clarity, can be meaningfully divided into two broad theoretical categories: the self of neural instantiation and the self of first-person experience (i.e., conscious awareness of personal subjectivity). Second, I discuss the nature of the self of first-person experience and its relation to scientific methods of inquiry. I argue that, in contrast to the self studied by neuroscience (i.e., the systems mediating knowledge of self), the self of conscious experience cannot yet be submitted to satisfying analysis via scientific methodology. Finally, I argue that "reality" does not consist in physicalism, mentalism, idealism, or any other "ism" that implies unity of process or substance. Rather, reality, in my view, is best treated as a plurality (James, 1909/1996) that cannot be confined to one (or two, as in dualism) basic categories.
机译:在本文中,我有三个目标。首先,我认为,自我这一概念在心理学理论中的巨大效用与其缺乏清晰性相匹配,可以有意义地分为两大类理论类别:神经实例化的自我和第一人称体验的自我(即,有意识地意识到个人主观性)。其次,我讨论了第一人称体验自我的本质及其与科学探究方法的关系。我认为,与神经科学研究的自我(即调解自我知识的系统)相反,有意识经验的自我尚不能通过科学方法论进行令人满意的分析。最后,我认为“现实”不包括物理主义,心理主义,理想主义或任何其他暗示过程或实质统一的“主义”。相反,在我看来,最好将现实视为不能局限于一个(或两个,如二元论)基本范畴的复数(James,1909/1996)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号