...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Retention projection enables accurate calculation of liquid chromatographic retention times across labs and methods
【24h】

Retention projection enables accurate calculation of liquid chromatographic retention times across labs and methods

机译:保留预测可以准确计算实验室和方法之间的液相色谱保留时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Identification of small molecules by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) can be greatly improved if the chromatographic retention information is used along with mass spectral information to narrow down the lists of candidates. Linear retention indexing remains the standard for sharing retention data across labs, but it is unreliable because it cannot properly account for differences in the experimental conditions used by various labs, even when the differences are relatively small and unintentional. On the other hand, an approach called "retention projection" properly accounts for many intentional differences in experimental conditions, and when combined with a "back-calculation" methodology described recently, it also accounts for unintentional differences. In this study, the accuracy of this methodology is compared with linear retention indexing across eight different labs. When each lab ran a test mixture under a range of multi-segment gradients and flow rates they selected independently, retention projections averaged 22-fold more accurate for uncharged compounds because they properly accounted for these intentional differences, which were more pronounced in steep gradients. When each lab ran the test mixture under nominally the same conditions, which is the ideal situation to reproduce linear retention indices, retention projections still averaged 2-fold more accurate because they properly accounted for many unintentional differences between the LC systems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most successful study to date aiming to calculate (or even just to reproduce) LC gradient retention across labs, and it is the only study in which retention was reliably calculated under various multi-segment gradients and flow rates chosen independently by labs. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:如果使用色谱保留信息和质谱信息来缩小候选列表的范围,则可以大大提高通过液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS)鉴定小分子的能力。线性保留索引仍然是在各个实验室之间共享保留数据的标准,但是它不可靠,因为它不能正确解释各个实验室使用的实验条件的差异,即使差异相对较小且是无意的。另一方面,一种称为“保留预测”的方法可以适当地解决实验条件下的许多有意差异,并且当与最近描述的“反向计算”方法结合使用时,也可以解决无意间的差异。在这项研究中,将该方法的准确性与八个不同实验室中的线性保留指数进行了比较。当每个实验室在各自独立选择的多段梯度和流速范围内运行测试混合物时,对于不带电荷的化合物,保留预测的平均准确度要高22倍,因为它们正确地解释了这些故意的差异,在陡峭的梯度中这种差异更为明显。当每个实验室在名义上相同的条件下运行测试混合物时(这是重现线性保留指数的理想情况),保留预测的平均准确度仍要高出2倍,因为它们适当地解释了液相色谱系统之间的许多意外差异。据我们所知,这是迄今为止最成功的研究,旨在计算(甚至只是复制)整个实验室的LC梯度保留,并且它是唯一在各种多段梯度和实验室独立选择的流速。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号