首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Randomized phase III trial to test accelerated versus standard fractionation in combination with concurrent cisplatin for head and neck carcinomas in the radiation therapy oncology group 0129 trial: Long-term report of efficacy and toxicity
【24h】

Randomized phase III trial to test accelerated versus standard fractionation in combination with concurrent cisplatin for head and neck carcinomas in the radiation therapy oncology group 0129 trial: Long-term report of efficacy and toxicity

机译:放射治疗肿瘤组0129试验的随机III期试验,用于测试加速和标准分馏联合顺铂联合治疗头颈部癌:疗效和毒性的长期报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: We tested the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus accelerated fractionation with a concomitant boost (AFX-C) versus standard fractionation (SFX) in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LA-HNC). Patients and Methods: Patients had stage III to IV carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. Radiation therapy schedules were 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (SFX) or 72 Gy in 42 fractions over 6 weeks (AFX-C). Cisplatin doses were 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for two (AFX-C) or three (SFX) cycles. Toxicities were scored by using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0 and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by using the one-sided log-rank test. Locoregional failure (LRF) and distant metastasis (DM) rates were estimated by using the cumulative incidence method and Gray's test. Results: In all, 721 of 743 patients were analyzable (361, SFX; 360, AFX-C). At a median follow-up of 7.9 years (range, 0.3 to 10.1 years) for 355 surviving patients, no differences were observed in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.18; P = .37; 8-year survival, 48% v 48%), PFS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.24; P = .52; 8-year estimate, 42% v 41%), LRF (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.38; P = .78; 8-year estimate, 37% v 39%), or DM (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.24; P = .16; 8-year estimate, 15% v 13%). For oropharyngeal cancer, p16-positive patients had better OS than p16-negative patients (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.42; P .001; 8-year survival, 70.9% v 30.2%). There were no statistically significant differences in the grade 3 to 5 acute or late toxicities between the two arms and p-16 status. Conclusion: When combined with cisplatin, AFX-C neither improved outcome nor increased late toxicity in patients with LA-HNC. Long-term high survival rates in p16-positive patients with oropharyngeal cancer support the ongoing efforts to explore deintensification.
机译:目的:我们在局部晚期头颈癌(LA-HNC)中测试了顺铂联合加速分馏(AFX-C)相对于标准分馏(SFX)的疗效和毒性。患者和方法:患者患有口腔癌,口咽癌,下咽癌或喉癌的III至IV期癌症。放射治疗的时间表是7周内35个分数的70 Gy(SFX)或6周内42个分数的72 Gy(AFX-C)。顺铂剂量为每3周100毫克/平方米,连续两个(AFX-C)或三个(SFX)周期。使用国家癌症研究所共同毒性标准2.0和放射治疗肿瘤学小组/欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织标准对毒性进行评分。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估算总体生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS),并使用单侧对数秩检验进行比较。通过使用累积发生率法和格雷氏检验来估计局部区域衰竭(LRF)和远处转移(DM)率。结果:总共可以分析743位患者中的721位(361位,SFX; 360位,AFX-C)。 355名存活患者的中位随访时间为7.9年(范围0.3至10.1年),观察到OS差异无统计学意义(危险比[HR]为0.96; 95%CI为0.79至1.18; P = 0.37; P = 0.37)。 8年生存率,48%对48%),PFS(HR,1.02; 95%CI,0.84至1.24; P = 0.52; 8年评估,42%对41%),LRF(HR,1.08; 95 %CI,0.84至1.38; P = 0.78; 8年估算,37%v 39%)或DM(HR,0.83; 95%CI,0.56至1.24; P = .16; 8年​​估算,15 %v 13%)。对于口咽癌,p16阳性患者的OS优于p16阴性患者(HR,0.30; 95%CI,0.21至0.42; P <.001; 8年生存率,70.9%vs 30.2%)。两组之间的3至5级急性或晚期毒性和p-16状态之间无统计学差异。结论:与顺铂联合使用时,AFX-C既没有改善LA-HNC患者的预后,也没有增加晚期毒性。 p16阳性口咽癌患者的长期高生存率支持了探索去强化的持续努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号