...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Efficacy of methylprednisolone on pain, fatigue, and appetite loss in patients with advanced cancer using opioids: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial
【24h】

Efficacy of methylprednisolone on pain, fatigue, and appetite loss in patients with advanced cancer using opioids: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

机译:甲泼尼龙对阿片类药物治疗晚期癌症患者的疼痛,疲劳和食欲不振的疗效:一项随机,安慰剂对照,双盲试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Results: A total of 592 patients were screened; 50 were randomly assigned, and 47 were analyzed. Baseline opioid level was 269.9 mg in the MP arm and 160.4 mg in the PL arm. At day-7 evaluation, there was no difference between the groups in pain intensity (MP, 3.60 v PL, 3.68; P =.88) or relative analgesic consumption (MP, 1.19 vPL, 1.20; P=.95). Clinically and statistically significant improvements were found in fatigue (-17 v 3 points; P.003), appetite loss (-24 v2 points; P=.003), and patient satisfaction (5.4 v2.0 points; P=.001) in favor of the MP compared with the PL group, respectively. There were no differences in adverse effects between the groups.Conclusion: MP 32 mg daily did not provide additional analgesia in patients with cancer receiving opioids, but it improved fatigue, appetite loss, and patient satisfaction. Clinical benefit beyond a short-term effect must be examined in a future study.Purpose: Corticosteroids are frequently used in cancer pain management despite limited evidence. This study compares the analgesic efficacy of corticosteroid therapy with placebo.Patients and Methods: Adult patients with cancer receiving opioids with average pain intensity ≥ 4 (numeric rating scale [NRS], 0 to 10) in the last 24 hours were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to methylprednisolone (MP) 16 mg twice daily or placebo (PL) for 7 days. Primary outcome was average pain ntensity measured at day 7 (NRS, 0 to 10); secondary outcomes were analgesic consumption (ora morphine equivalents), fatigue and appetite loss (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire C30, 0 to 100), and patient satisfaction (NRS, 0 to 10)
机译:结果:共筛选出592例患者。随机分配了50个,并分析了47个。 MP组的阿片基线水平为269.9 mg,PL组的阿片水平为160.4 mg。在第7天评估时,两组之间的疼痛强度(MP,3.60 v PL,3.68; P = .88)或相对镇痛剂的消耗量(MP,1.19 vPL,1.20; P = .95)没有差异。在疲劳(-17 v 3点; P.003),食欲不振(-24 v2点; P = .003)和患者满意度(5.4 v2.0点; P = .001)方面,在临床和统计学上都有显着改善。与PL组相比,分别支持MP。两组之间的不良反应没有差异。结论:每天MP 32 mg并不能为接受阿片类药物的癌症患者提供额外的镇痛作用,但可以改善疲劳,食欲不振和患者满意度。目的:尽管证据有限,但皮质类固醇激素仍常用于癌症疼痛的治疗。这项研究比较了皮质类固醇和安慰剂的镇痛效果。患者和方法:合格的成年癌症患者在过去24小时内接受平均疼痛强度≥4(数字等级量表[NRS],0至10)的阿片类药物。患者被随机分配到每天两次两次两次接受16 mg甲基强的松龙(MP)或7天的安慰剂(PL)。主要结果是在第7天测量的平均疼痛强度(NRS,0至10);次要结局为镇痛药消耗量(或吗啡当量),疲劳和食欲不振(欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷C30,0至100)和患者满意度(NRS,0至10)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号