...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Correcting for discretionary treatment crossover in an analysis of survival in the Breast International Group BIG 1-98 trial by using the inverse probability of censoring weighted method.
【24h】

Correcting for discretionary treatment crossover in an analysis of survival in the Breast International Group BIG 1-98 trial by using the inverse probability of censoring weighted method.

机译:通过使用加权加权方法的逆概率,在乳腺癌国际组织BIG 1-98试验的生存分析中校正了酌情治疗交叉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The authors of the accompanying article should be commended for a clear and thoughtful investigation of the survival comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen from the data of the BIG 1-98 trial. This major breast cancer trial showed a statistically significant disease-free survival (DFS) advantage for patients randomly assigned to letrozole, but this did not translate into a significant overall survival (OS) advantage, possibly because of the impact of a crossover by patients using tamoxifen therapy to letrozole therapy when evidence of benefit on DFS was released. While the treatment crossover may have been necessary on ethical grounds, it left the scientific audience with an uncertainty about whether letrozole could offer a survival advantage.
机译:应该赞扬所附文章的作者根据BIG 1-98试验的数据对来曲唑和他莫昔芬的生存率比较进行清晰,周到的调查。这项主要的乳腺癌试验显示,随机分配给来曲唑的患者具有统计学上显着的无病生存(DFS)优势,但这并未转化为显着的总体生存(OS)优势,这可能是因为使用当对DFS有益处的证据被释放时,他莫昔芬疗法转为来曲唑疗法。尽管出于伦理学的考虑可能需要进行治疗交叉,但是这给科学观众带来了来曲唑是否可以提供生存优势的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号