首页> 外文期刊>Current diabetes reviews >The Effectiveness of Footwear and Other Removable Off-loading Devices in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Footwear and Other Removable Off-loading Devices in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review

机译:鞋类和其他可拆卸卸荷设备在治疗糖尿病足溃疡中的有效性:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: To conduct a systematic review which examined the effectiveness of footwear and other removable off-loading devices as interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers or the alteration of biomechanical factors associated with ulcer healing and to discuss the quality and interpret the findings of research to date. Methods: The CINAHL, Medline and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched with seventeen articles identified for review. Results: Majority of the identified studies were randomised control trials which compared the ulcer healing rates of different footwear and other removable off-loading device interventions. Three categories of interventions were identified; 1) removable cast walkers (RCWs), 2) half or heel relief shoes and 3) therapeutic shoes. Most studies compared at least one intervention to a total contact cast (TCC). Factors which influenced study findings such as TCC application method, compliance, activity levels, and the footwear worn on the contralateral limb are discussed with recommendations provided for future studies. Conclusion: Due to the lack of randomised controlled studies conducted in this area it is not currently possible to make strong conclusions on the interventions effectiveness. However, it appears the currently available therapeutic shoes were the least effective intervention followed by half or heel relief shoes. RCWs were found to be the most effective of the removable devices.
机译:目的:进行系统的审查,以检查鞋类和其他可拆卸的卸荷装置作为治疗糖尿病足溃疡或改变与溃疡愈合相关的生物力学因素的干预措施的有效性,并讨论其质量并解释研究结果至今。方法:通过检索17篇文章进行检索,检索CINAHL,Medline和Cochrane对照试验注册数据库。结果:大部分已鉴定的研究是随机对照试验,比较了不同鞋类和其他可移动卸荷设备干预措施的溃疡愈合率。确定了三类干预措施: 1)可移动的石膏助行器(RCW),2)半鞋或后跟缓解鞋以及3)治疗鞋。大多数研究将至少一种干预与总接触演员(TCC)进行了比较。讨论了影响研究结果的因素,例如TCC施用方法,依从性,活动水平和对侧肢体穿着的鞋类,并提供了建议,以供将来研究之用。结论:由于缺乏在该领域进行的随机对照研究,目前尚无法就干预措施的有效性做出强有力的结论。然而,似乎目前可用的治疗鞋是最无效的干预措施,其次是半脚或后跟缓解鞋。发现RCW是可移动设备中最有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号