首页> 外文期刊>CRUSTACEANA >DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF CHELIPED AUTOTOMY BY THE MUD FIDDLER CRAB UCA P UGNAX (SMITH, 1870) (DECAPODA, OCYPODIDAE) WHEN ESCAPING PREDATION BY THE BLUE CRAB CALLINECTES SAPIDUS (RATHBUN, 1896)
【24h】

DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF CHELIPED AUTOTOMY BY THE MUD FIDDLER CRAB UCA P UGNAX (SMITH, 1870) (DECAPODA, OCYPODIDAE) WHEN ESCAPING PREDATION BY THE BLUE CRAB CALLINECTES SAPIDUS (RATHBUN, 1896)

机译:当蓝蟹CALCALCTES SAPIDUS逃逸繁殖时,泥浆蟹CRCA UCA P UGNAX(SMITH,1870)(DECAPODA,OCYPODIDAE)使用切碎的自体细胞的差异(RATHBUN,1896年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Autotomy of limbs has been observed for a variety of organisms and in some taxa has been shown to be an effective strategy for escaping prédation. We investigated differences in the use of cheliped autotomy by small and large male fiddler crabs during prédation events, and also assessed if autotomy of the major cheliped, allowed male fiddler crabs to escape prédation more often than females. The blue crab Callinectes sapidus was presented with 5 small and 5 large male mud fiddler crabs Uca pugnax(n = 60), and in a second experiment, 5 male and 5 female U. pugnax were presented to C. sapidus (n = 60). Large U. pugnax autotomized their major cheliped more often and survived compared to small U. pugnax (n = 22 pools, S = 96.5, p < 0.0001), althoughthis difference was not significant when adjusted for the total number of attacks on each size (n = 22 pools, S = 45, p = 0.1467). There was no significant difference (n = 29 pools, S = 30.5, p = 0.4988) between the total number of unsuccessful attackson male versus female U. pugnax. At least half of the males autotomized their major cheliped in unsuccessful attacks during the first (69%) and second (53%) experiments. The major cheliped of male U. pugnax is a prominent visual stimulus that may have initially attracted C. sapidus to this prey; however, autotomization potentially enabled male fiddler crabs to escape prédation in over half of all unsuccessful attacks.
机译:已观察到多种生物体的肢体切开术,并且在某些分类中已显示出逃脱ré杀的有效策略。我们调查了大小捕捞事件中大小雄性小提琴蟹在使用唇状切开术方面的差异,并评估了主要的唇形切开术是否允许雄性提琴蟹比雌性更频繁地逃脱p陷。向蓝蟹Callinectes sapidus展示了5只小和5只大公泥浆招蟹蟹Uca pugnax(n = 60),在第二个实验中,向C. sapidus展示了5头雄性和5头雌性U. pugnax(n = 60)。 。与小尾small(n = 22池,S = 96.5,p <0.0001)相比,大尾U对它们的主要螯合物进行更频繁的解剖处理并存活下来,尽管在针对每种大小的攻击总数进行调整后,这种差异并不显着( n = 22个池,S = 45,p = 0.1467)。对雄性和雌性U. pugnax的未成功攻击总数没有显着差异(n = 29个库,S = 30.5,p = 0.4988)。在第一个实验(69%)和第二个实验(53%)中,至少一半的雄性动物将未成功攻击的大鹅口疮进行了自动化处理。雄性U. pugnax的主要特征是明显的视觉刺激,可能最初吸引了C. sapidus到该猎物。但是,在所有未成功攻击的一半以上中,自动解剖可能使雄提琴蟹逃脱沉陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号