首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Aortic stiffness and incident hypertension
【24h】

Aortic stiffness and incident hypertension

机译:主动脉僵硬和高血压

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Reply: Dr Protogerou and colleagues raise 2 main questions. First, does the relationship between CFPWV and incident hypertension differ for isolated systolic hypertension, isolated diastolic hypertension, and combined systolic and diastolic hypertension? Second, does abnormal CFPWV (as a categorical variable) predict future hypertension or hypertension subtypes?With regard to different subtypes of hypertension, we observed that of the 338 cases of incident hypertension at examination cycle 8 in our sample, few were isolated diastolic (n=17) or combined systolic and diastolic (n=26), whereas the majority were either isolated systolic (n= 102) or not classifiable due to antihypertensive treatment (n=193). Because of the small number of incident cases that can be classified as isolated diastolic or combined hypertension, we cannot draw conclusions on the relationship between aortic stiffness (whether as a continuous or categorical value) and the subtype of hypertension.
机译:回复:Protogerou博士及其同事提出了两个主要问题。首先,对于单纯的收缩期高血压,单纯的舒张期高血压以及合并的收缩期和舒张期高血压,CFPWV与突发性高血压之间的关系是否有所不同?其次,异常的CFPWV(作为分类变量)是否可以预测未来的高血压或高血压亚型?关于高血压的不同亚型,我们观察到在样本第8个检查周期的338例突发性高血压病例中,很少有孤立的舒张压(n = 17)或收缩压和舒张压联合使用(n = 26),而大多数是单纯的收缩压(n = 102)或由于降压治疗而无法分类(n = 193)。由于可以分类为单纯性舒张性或合并性高血压的事件较少,因此我们无法就主动脉僵硬(无论是连续性还是分类性值)与高血压亚型之间的关系得出结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号