...
首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: The comfortable AMI randomized trial
【24h】

Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: The comfortable AMI randomized trial

机译:具有生物可降解聚合物的生物limimus洗脱支架与裸金属支架对急性心肌梗死患者心血管事件的影响:舒适的AMI随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents remains controversial in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objective: To compare stents eluting biolimus from a biodegradable polymer with bare-metal stents in primary PCI. Design, Setting, and Patients: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial of 1161 patients presenting with STEMI at 11 sites in Europe and Israel between September 19, 2009, and January 25, 2011. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 and 12 months. Intervention: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive the biolimus-eluting stent (n=575) or the bare-metal stent (n=582). Main Outcome Measures: Primary end point was the rate of major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related reinfarction, and ischemiadriven target-lesion revascularization at 1 year. Results: Major adverse cardiac events at 1 year occurred in 24 patients (4.3%) receiving biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer and 49 patients (8.7%) receiving bare-metal stents (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.80; P=.004). The difference was driven by a lower risk of target vessel-related reinfarction (3 [0.5%] vs 15 [2.7%]; HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69; P=.01) and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (9 [1.6%] vs 32 [5.7%]; HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.59; P<.001) in patients receiving biolimus-eluting stents compared with those receiving bare-metal stents. Rates of cardiac death were not significantly different (16 [2.9%] vs 20 [3.5%], P=.53). Definite stent thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (0.9%) treated with biolimus-eluting stents and 12 patients (2.1%; HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.15-1.19; P=.10) treated with bare-metal stents. Conclusion: Compared with a bare-metal stent, the use of biolimus-eluting stents with a biodegradable polymer resulted in a lower rate of the composite of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00962416.
机译:背景:在进行初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架相比的有效性和安全性尚存争议。目的:比较从可生物降解的聚合物洗脱生物胶的支架与裸金属支架在主要PCI中的应用。设计,设置和患者:于2009年9月19日至2011年1月25日在欧洲和以色列的11个地点对1161名患有STEMI的患者进行了一项前瞻性,随机,单盲,对照试验。 1和12个月。干预:将患者按1:1的比例随机分配以接受生物lim洗脱支架(n = 575)或裸金属支架(n = 582)。主要结果指标:主要终点是1年时主要的不良心脏事件发生率,心脏死亡,靶血管相关性再梗塞和缺血性驱动的靶病变血运重建的综合发生率。结果:1年的主要不良心脏事件发生在24例(4.3%)接受可生物降解聚合物的生物胶洗脱支架和49例(8.7%)接受裸金属支架的患者(危险比[HR],0.49; 95%CI, 0.30-0.80; P = .004)。差异的产生是由靶血管相关性再梗死的风险较低(3 [0.5%]比15 [2.7%]; HR,0.20; 95%CI,0.06-0.69; P = .01)和缺血性驱动的目标-与使用裸金属支架的患者相比,接受生物胶体洗脱支架的患者的病变血运重建率(9 [1.6%] vs 32 [5.7%]; HR,0.28; 95%CI,0.13-0.59; P <.001)。心源性死亡率无显着差异(16 [2.9%] vs 20 [3.5%],P = .53)。接受生物limimus洗脱支架治疗的患者中明确发生了支架血栓形成(5%)(0.9%),使用裸金属支架治疗的患者中有12位患者(2.1%; HR,0.42; 95%CI,0.15-1.19; P = .10)。结论:与裸金属支架相比,使用可生物降解聚合物的生物limimus洗脱支架可降低接受原发PCI的STEMI患者在1年时主要不良心脏事件的发生率。试用注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00962416。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号