首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Incident stroke and mortality associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with severe sepsis.
【24h】

Incident stroke and mortality associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with severe sepsis.

机译:重度脓毒症住院患者的新发房颤相关的中风和死亡率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported in 6% to 20% of patients with severe sepsis. Chronic AF is a known risk factor for stroke and death, but the clinical significance of new-onset AF in the setting of severe sepsis is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the in-hospital stroke and in-hospital mortality risks associated with new-onset AF in patients with severe sepsis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective population-based cohort of California State Inpatient Database administrative claims data from nonfederal acute care hospitals for January 1 through December 31, 2007. PATIENTS: Data were available for 3,144,787 hospitalized adults. Severe sepsis (n = 49,082 [1.56%]) was defined by validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 995.92. New-onset AF was defined as AF that occurred during the hospital stay, after excluding AF cases present at admission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A priori outcome measures were in-hospital ischemic stroke (ICD-9-CM codes 433, 434, or 436) and mortality. RESULTS: Patients with severe sepsis were a mean age of 69 (SD, 16) years and 48% were women. New-onset AF occurred in 5.9% of patients with severe sepsis vs 0.65% of patients without severe sepsis (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio [OR], 6.82; 95% CI, 6.54-7.11; P < .001). Severe sepsis was present in 14% of all new-onset AF in hospitalized adults. Compared with severe sepsis patients without new-onset AF, patients with new-onset AF during severe sepsis had greater risks of in-hospital stroke (75/2896 [2.6%] vs 306/46,186 [0.6%] strokes; adjusted OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.05-3.57; P < .001) and in-hospital mortality (1629 [56%] vs 18,027 [39%] deaths; adjusted relative risk, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11; P < .001). Findings were robust across 2 definitions of severe sepsis, multiple methods of addressing confounding, and multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Among patients with severe sepsis, patients with new-onset AF were at increased risk of in-hospital stroke and death compared with patients with no AF and patients with preexisting AF.
机译:背景:据报道,有严重脓毒症的患者中有6%至20%发生新发房颤(AF)。慢性房颤是导致卒中和死亡的已知危险因素,但尚不确定新发房颤在严重脓毒症中的临床意义。目的:确定严重脓毒症患者新发房颤的院内卒中和院内死亡风险。设计与地点:2007年1月1日至2007年12月31日期间,来自非联邦急诊医院的加利福尼亚州住院患者数据库行政人群回顾性队列研究数据。严重脓毒症(n = 49,082 [1.56%])由经过验证的国际疾病分类,第9版,临床修改(ICD-9-CM)代码995.92定义。新发房颤定义为在住院期间发生的房颤,不包括入院时出现的房颤。主要观察指标:先验结果指标为院内缺血性中风(ICD-9-CM代码433、434或436)和死亡率。结果:严重脓毒症患者的平均年龄为69岁(SD,16)岁,女性为48%。重度脓毒症患者中有5.9%发生新发房颤,而无重度脓毒症患者中有0.65%发生新发房颤(多变量校正比值比[OR],6.82; 95%CI,6.54-7.11; P <.001)。住院成人中所有新发房颤中有14%存在严重脓毒症。与没有新发房颤的重症败血症患者相比,重症败血症中有新发房颤的患者发生院内中风的风险更高(75/2896 [2.6%] vs 306 / 46,186 [0.6%]中风;校正后OR值为2.70 ; 95%CI,2.05-3.57; P <.001)和院内死亡率(1629 [56%]比18,027 [39%]死亡;调整后的相对风险,1.07; 95%CI,1.04-1.11; P <。 001)。在严重脓毒症的两种定义,解决混淆的多种方法以及多种敏感性分析中,发现是可靠的。结论:在严重脓毒症患者中,新发房颤患者的院内中风和死亡风险高于无房颤和已有房颤的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号