首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults: a randomized trial.
【24h】

Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults: a randomized trial.

机译:住房和病例管理计划对慢性病无家可归的成年人急诊就诊和住院的影响:一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Homeless adults, especially those with chronic medical illnesses, are frequent users of costly medical services, especially emergency department and hospital services. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a case management and housing program in reducing use of urgent medical services among homeless adults with chronic medical illnesses. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trial conducted at a public teaching hospital and a private, nonprofit hospital in Chicago, Illinois. Participants were 407 social worker-referred homeless adults with chronic medical illnesses (89% of referrals) from September 2003 until May 2006, with follow-up through December 2007. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. INTERVENTION: Housing offered as transitional housing after hospitalization discharge, followed by placement in long-term housing; case management offered on-site at primary study sites, transitional housing, and stable housing sites. Usual care participants received standard discharge planning from hospital social workers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospitalizations, hospital days, and emergency department visits measured using electronic surveillance, medical records, and interviews. Models were adjusted for baseline differences in demographics, insurance status, prior hospitalization or emergency department visit, human immunodeficiency virus infection, current use of alcohol or other drugs, mental health symptoms, and other factors. RESULTS: The analytic sample (n = 405 [n = 201 for the intervention group, n = 204 for the usual care group]) was 78% men and 78% African American, with a median duration of homelessness of 30 months. After 18 months, 73% of participants had at least 1 hospitalization or emergency department visit. Compared with the usual care group, the intervention group had unadjusted annualized mean reductions of 0.5 hospitalizations (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.2 to 0.2), 2.7 fewer hospital days (95% CI, -5.6 to 0.2), and 1.2 fewer emergency department visits(95% CI, -2.4 to 0.03). Adjusting for baseline covariates, compared with the usual care group, the intervention group had a relative reduction of 29% in hospitalizations (95% CI, 10% to 44%), 29% in hospital days (95% CI, 8% to 45%), and 24% in emergency department visits (95% CI, 3% to 40%). CONCLUSION: After adjustment, offering housing and case management to a population of homeless adults with chronic medical illnesses resulted in fewer hospital days and emergency department visits, compared with usual care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00490581.
机译:背景:无家可归的成年人,尤其是那些患有慢性疾病的成年人,经常使用昂贵的医疗服务,尤其是急诊和医院服务。目的:评估病例管理和住房计划在减少患有慢性病的无家可归的成年人中使用紧急医疗服务的有效性。设计,地点和参与者:在伊利诺伊州芝加哥的一家公立教学医院和一家私人非营利性医院进行的随机对照试验。从2003年9月至2006年5月,有407名社会工作者推荐的无家可归者患有慢性医疗疾病的成年人(占转诊的89%),并随访至2007年12月。分析采用意向性治疗方法。干预:住院出院后提供的过渡性住房,然后安置在长期住房中;在主要学习场所,过渡性住房和稳定住房场所提供案例管理。通常护理参与者从医院的社会工作者那里收到了标准的出院计划。主要观察指标:住院,住院天数和急诊就诊情况,通过电子监控,病历和访谈来衡量。针对人口统计学,保险状况,先前住院或急诊就诊,人类免疫缺陷病毒感染,当前使用酒精或其他药物,精神健康症状和其他因素的基线差异对模型进行了调整。结果:分析样本(n = 405 [干预组n = 201,常规护理组n = 204])为78%的男性和78%的非洲裔美国人,无家可归的持续时间中位数为30个月。 18个月后,73%的参与者至少进行了一次住院或急诊就诊。与常规护理组相比,干预组的住院患者未经调整的年平均降低住院量为0.5(95%置信区间[CI],-1.2至0.2),住院天数减少了2.7(95%CI,-5.6至0.2),而1.2急诊就诊次数更少(95%CI,-2.4至0.03)。校正基线协变量后,与普通护理组相比,干预组的住院治疗相对减少了29%(95%CI,10%至44%),住院天数减少了29%(95%CI,8%至45%)。 %)和急诊就诊的24%(​​95%CI,3%至40%)。结论:与常规护理相比,调整后,为患有慢性病的无家可归的成年人提供住房和病例管理,可以减少住院日和急诊就诊次数。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00490581。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号