...
首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >Phase II randomized, double-blinded comparison of a single high dose (5 x 10(8) TCID50) of modified vaccinia Ankara compared to a standard dose (1 x 10(8) TCID50) in healthy vaccinia-naive individuals
【24h】

Phase II randomized, double-blinded comparison of a single high dose (5 x 10(8) TCID50) of modified vaccinia Ankara compared to a standard dose (1 x 10(8) TCID50) in healthy vaccinia-naive individuals

机译:在未经疫苗接种的健康个体中,单次高剂量(5 x 10(8)TCID50)改良牛痘疫苗与标准剂量(1 x 10(8)TCID50)的II期随机双盲比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Reintroduction of Variola major as an agent of bioterrorism remains a concern. Time to seroconversion and plague reduction neutralizing antibody titers (PRNT) of 1 or 2 standard doses (SD) were compared to a single high dose (HD) of modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA). Methods: Ninety subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive 1 HD or 2 SD of MVA subcutaneously on Days 0 and 28 in a placebo-controlled trial. Serum was collected for PRNT and ELISA. Subjects were followed for safety for the entire study. Results: The HD was well-tolerated. Using Bavarian Nordic's ELISA, subjects in both groups achieved seroconversion by Study Day 15 (HD) and Day 28 (SD). Before second vaccination, the hazard rate of seroconverting for the HD group was 1.7 times the SD group with a median time for seroconversion of 14 days for both groups. The peak titer of one HD vaccine was superior to one dose of SD vaccine but inferior to the peak titer after the second dose of the SD vaccination regimen. Using Saint Louis University's PRNT, peak titers were 95.8 and 65.2 for the HD and SD groups, respectively, prior to second vaccination. Non-inferiority of the SD group was not established. The proportions of positives were 93.3% (42/45) and 82.2% (37/45) for the HD and SD groups, respectively. The peak titer after two standard doses was superior to that of the HD. Conclusions: HD MVA was safe and well-tolerated. While the hazard rate for seroconverting was significantly higher in the HD group before second dose, the effect was small as the median time to seroconversion was identical. When comparing PRNT, non-inferiority of one SD was not established and the peak titers were low for both groups. The HD peak response was inferior to the standard two-dose regimen response based on ELISA and PRNT
机译:简介:作为生物恐怖主义的推动者,瓦里奥拉少校的重新引入仍然令人担忧。将1或2个标准剂量(SD)的血清转化时间和减少鼠疫的中和抗体滴度(PRNT)与单次高剂量(HD)改良牛痘(MVA)进行了比较。方法:在安慰剂对照试验中,将90名受试者在第0天和第28天以1:1的比例随机分配至皮下接受1 HD或2 SD的MVA。收集血清用于PRNT和ELISA。为了整个研究的安全性,对受试者进行了跟踪。结果:HD的耐受性良好。使用巴伐利亚北欧的ELISA,两组受试者均在研究第15天(HD)和第28天(SD)达到血清转化。在第二次疫苗接种之前,HD组的血清转化危险率为SD组的1.7倍,两组的血清转化时间中位数为14天。一种HD疫苗的峰值滴度优于一剂SD疫苗,但次于第二剂SD疫苗接种方案后的峰值滴度。使用圣路易斯大学的PRNT,在第二次接种疫苗之前,HD和SD组的最高滴度分别为95.8和65.2。没有确定SD组的自卑感。 HD和SD组的阳性比例分别为93.3%(42/45)和82.2%(37/45)。两次标准剂量后的峰值滴度优于HD。结论:HD MVA安全且耐受良好。虽然HD组在第二次给药前血清转化的危险率显着较高,但由于血清转化的中位时间相同,因此效果很小。比较PRNT时,未确定一个SD的非劣效性,两组的滴度均较低。 HD峰响应不如基于ELISA和PRNT的标准两剂方案响应

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号