...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation Proceedings >Progression of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: dropout or liver transplantation?
【24h】

Progression of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: dropout or liver transplantation?

机译:肝移植前肝细胞癌的进展:辍学还是肝移植?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Tumor progression before liver transplantation (OLT) is the main cause of dropout from the waiting list (WL) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to show a correlation between adopted dropout criteria and dropout/intention-to-treat survival rates of WL HCC patients. METHODS: The study period was 2000 to 2007. The dropout criteria were macroscopic vascular invasion, metastases, or a poorly differentiated tumor. Adult patients with benign chronic liver disease enlisted for primary OLT in the same period represented the control group. RESULTS: Dropout probability of study (n = 128) versus control group (n = 377) subjects was similar: namely, 12% at 1 year in both groups (P = NS). Intention-to-treat survival curve of the HCC group overlapped that of the benign group (5-year survival rates were 73% and 71%, respectively; P = NS). At the time of listing, 103 study group patients were within the Milan criteria (MC): among these patients, 29 (28%) showed tumor progression beyond MC before OLT. Simulating the dropout of these 29 patients at the time of diagnosis of tumor progression, we compared the dropout probability of the 103 patients within MC with that of the control group. As a result, the 1- and 2-year dropout rates became 37% and 53%, respectively, in the study group, which were significantly higher than those in the controls (P < .01). CONCLUSION: HCC patients on the WL showed a significantly greater dropout rate than subjects with benign cirrhosis when too restrictive radiologic dropout criteria were used. The adoption of criteria more related to biological aggressiveness of a tumor decreased the dropout risk for HCC patients without impairing their intention-to-treat survival rates.
机译:背景:肝移植(OLT)之前的肿瘤进展是肝细胞癌(HCC)患者等待名单(WL)退出的主要原因。这项研究的目的是显示所采用的辍学标准与WL HCC患者的辍学/意向治疗生存率之间的相关性。方法:研究期为2000年至2007年。辍学标准为宏观血管侵犯,转移或低分化肿瘤。同期入组原发性OLT的良性慢性肝病成年患者为对照组。结果:研究(n = 128)与对照组(n = 377)受试者的辍学概率相似:即两组在1年时12%(P = NS)。 HCC组的意向治疗生存曲线与良性组重叠(5年生存率分别为73%和71%; P = NS)。在上市时,有103名研究组患者符合米兰标准(MC):在这些患者中,有29名(28%)的肿瘤进展超过OLT前的MC。模拟在诊断肿瘤进展时这29名患者的辍学情况,我们将MC内103例患者的辍学概率与对照组进行了比较。结果,研究组的1年和2年辍学率分别为37%和53%,显着高于对照组(P <0.01)。结论:使用限制性太高的放射学辍学标准时,WL上的HCC患者的辍学率明显高于良性肝硬化患者。采用与肿瘤的生物学侵袭性更相关的标准可以降低HCC患者的辍学风险,而不会损害他们的治疗意愿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号