首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >Where next for Francis?
【24h】

Where next for Francis?

机译:弗朗西斯接下来要去哪里?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

"WE ALL know deep down that there's a little bit of Mid Staffs in every trust." A senior pharmacist told The Journal this at a Royal Pharmaceutical Society event this week. It is a bold statement — uncomfortable, stomach-turning and most likely true. It is tempting to seek to distance yourself from the Mid Staffs mess — to claim that that kind of catastrophic neglect could not possibly happen in your patch. Mid Staffs is an extreme case that highlights how wrongly things can go when organisational culture is fundamentally flawed and cash trumps care. But, painful as it might be, clinicians and managers should get as close as they can to QC Robert Francis's report.
机译:“我们深深地知道,每个信任中都有一些中层人员。”一位高级药剂师在本周皇家制药协会的一次活动上对《华尔街日报》表示。这是一个大胆的声明-不舒服,发脾气并且很可能是真的。试图使自己远离中层人员混乱-声称在您的补丁程序中可能不会发生这种灾难性的疏忽。中层员工是一个极端案例,强调了当组织文化从根本上存在缺陷并且现金战胜了人们的关心时,事情会发生多大的错误。但是,尽管可能会很痛苦,但临床医生和管理人员应尽可能接近QC Robert Francis的报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号