首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >Are we considered knowledgeable?
【24h】

Are we considered knowledgeable?

机译:我们被认为是知识渊博的吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I was interested to read Mr D. Brown's letter about "Too many fanciful visionaries" (PJ, 19 January 2008, p51). Despite our rigorous training, we are challenged to take over all those unnecessary tasks he speaks of, while we are still prevented from supplying certain prescription medicines that have a low, if any, potential for abuse. If a regular customer walks in who is on, for example, long-term furosemide and who cannot obtain for whatever reason a prescription, we may not dispense. At best, we can make an emergency supply with all the considerations and implications this may have (including ethical ones, the assessment of genuine need, keeping a record, etc).
机译:我很想读布朗先生关于“太多幻想的幻想家”的信(PJ,2008年1月19日,第51页)。尽管我们进行了严格的培训,但仍然面临挑战,我们要接管他所说的所有那些不必要的任务,而我们仍然无法提供某些可能滥用药物的处方药。如果常规客户走进谁家,例如长期使用速尿,谁因某种原因而无法获得处方,我们可能不会分配。充其量,我们可以提供具有所有考虑因素和含义的紧急物资(包括道德方面的考虑,对真实需求的评估,保留记录等)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号