首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Authors' reply
【24h】

Authors' reply

机译:作者的回信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Philipe de Souto Barreto raises two important points: first, was the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-15 the most appropriate measure for this study? And second, was an adequate amount of exercise delivered? For a large pragmatic trial, the GDS-15 is the most appropriate and practical primary outcome. The assessment is shorter than competing measures, it is usable by research staff without specialised training, it does not require carer interviews, it does not include somatic symptoms, and it has recognised measurement properties.1 While some reports have suggested lower internal consistency for GDS-15 in cognitively impaired care home residents, others suggest strong internal consistency and consistency with external measures of depression even in more cognitively impaired residents.
机译:Philipe de Souto Barreto提出了两个重要观点:首先,老年抑郁量表(GDS)-15是否最适合本研究的指标?其次,是否进行了足够的运动?对于大型的实用试验,GDS-15是最合适,最实用的主要结果。该评估比竞争性评估更短,评估人员可以在没有经过专门培训的情况下使用,不需要进行护理人员访谈,不包含躯体症状,并且具有公认的度量标准。1尽管有些报告表明GDS的内部一致性较低。 -15在有认知障碍的疗养院居民中,其他人甚至在更多有认知障碍的居民中也表现出强烈的内部一致性和与抑郁症外部衡量的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号