...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Short-term versus long-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (Flec-SL): a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment trial.
【24h】

Short-term versus long-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (Flec-SL): a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment trial.

机译:心房颤动复律后短期和长期抗心律失常药物治疗(Flec-SL):一项前瞻性,随机,开放标签,盲目的终点评估试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Antiarrhythmic drugs prolong the atrial action potential and refractory period, and thereby prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation after cardioversion. The atrial action potential normalises after 2-4 weeks of sinus rhythm, suggesting that antiarrhythmic drugs might not be needed beyond that period. Therefore, we investigated whether short-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment after cardioversion is non-inferior to long-term treatment.We enrolled patients in a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment trial between May 4, 2007, and March 12, 2010, at 44 centres in Germany. Eligible patients were adults with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing planned cardioversion. After successful cardioversion, patients were randomly assigned in permuted blocks of six per centre to: no antiarrhythmic drug treatment (control); treatment with flecainide (200-300 mg per day) for 4 weeks (short-term treatment); or flecainide for 6 months (long-term treatment). The primary endpoint was time to persistent atrial fibrillation or death. Patients and clinicians were unmasked to group assignment and treatment. The primary outcome was assessed in a core laboratory, members of which were masked to treatment group. Patients were monitored for 6 months by daily telemetric electrocardiograph (ECG) and centrally adjudicated Holter ECG recordings whenever atrial fibrillation was noted in two consecutive ECGs. Analyses were per protocol. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN62728742.After assay sensitivity was established with 4-week follow-up data from 242 patients showing that flecainide was superior to no treatment (Kaplan-Meier survival 70·2%vs 52·5%; p=0·0160), the trial continued to compare short-term versus long-term treatment. The primary outcome occurred in 120 (46%) of 261 patients receiving short-term treatment and in 103 (39%) of 263 patients receiving long-term treatment (event-free survival 48·4% [95% CI 41·9-55·0] vs 56·4% [49·1-63·6]; Kaplan-Meier estimate of difference 7·9% [-1·9 to 17·7]; p=0·2081 for non-inferiority; margin prespecified at 12%). In a post-hoc landmark analysis of patients who had not reached the primary endpoint in the first month, long-term treatment was superior to short-term treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate of difference 14·3% [5·1-23·6]; hazard ratio 0·31 [0·18-0·56]; p=0·0001).Short-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment after cardioversion is less effective than is long-term treatment, but can prevent most recurrences of atrial fibrillation.The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 3M Medica, and MEDA Pharmaceuticals.
机译:抗心律失常药物延长了心房动作电位和不应期,从而防止了心脏复律后的房颤复发。窦性心律2-4周后,心房动作电位恢复正常,这表明在此期间可能不需要抗心律失常药物。因此,我们调查了心脏复律后短期抗心律失常药物治疗是否不逊于长期治疗。我们在2007年5月4日至3月12日期间对患者进行了一项前瞻性,随机,开放标签,盲法终点评估试验。 2010年,在德国的44个中心举行。符合条件的患者是接受计划性心脏复律的持续性房颤的成年人。成功进行心脏复律后,将患者按每个中心六个小组的随机分组分配给:无抗心律失常药物治疗(对照);用氟卡尼胺(每天200-300 mg)治疗4周(短期治疗);或氟卡尼6个月(长期治疗)。主要终点是持续性心房纤颤或死亡的时间。患者和临床医生无需进行小组分配和治疗。主要结果在一个核心实验室中进行了评估,其成员被掩盖在治疗组中。通过每日遥测心电图(ECG)监测患者6个月,并在连续两个连续ECG中发现房颤时,对中心动态Holter ECG记录进行监测。根据方案进行分析。该试验的注册号为ISRCTN62728742。在对242名患者进行了为期4周的随访数据后,确定了测定敏感性后,显示氟卡尼比优于未治疗(Kaplan-Meier存活率70·2%vs 52·5%; p = 0 ·0160),该试验继续比较短期治疗和长期治疗。主要结果发生在接受短期治疗的261例患者中的120(46%)和接受长期治疗的263例患者中103(39%)(无事件生存率48·4%[95%CI 41·9- 55·0] vs 56·4%[49·1-63·6]; Kaplan-Meier差异估计为7·9%[-1·9至17·7]; p = 0·2081为非自卑;保证金为12%)。在对第一个月内未达到主要终点的患者进行的事后地标分析中,长期治疗优于短期治疗(Kaplan-Meier差异估计为14·3%[5·1-23· 6];危险比0·31 [0·18-0·56]; p = 0·0001)。电复律后短期抗心律失常药物治疗的疗效不如长期治疗有效,但可以防止大多数房颤复发德国联邦教育和研究部,Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft,3M Medica和MEDA Pharmaceuticals。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号