...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Morality in the NHS Marketplace
【24h】

Morality in the NHS Marketplace

机译:NHS市场中的道德

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

On Nov 5, 2013, the outgoing chief executive of the National Health Service (NHS) Sir David Nicholson announced that “privatisation and competition were not proving to be a success”.In the wake of the Health and Social Care Act, the role of the NHS has come under increasing moral scrutiny. Here, we postulate that the health-care market is morally questionable on two counts.First, in its present form, the health-care market might curtail individual liberty. The UK commissioning model currently resembles a wholesale market more closely than a retail market, with the need for a commissioning middleman. Moreover, each commissioner contracts with a fairly narrow range of providers, thereby limiting patient choice. Theoretically, providers might tender to obtain substantial market share and then exploit the inevitable wiggle room in contracts that cannot cover every eventuality. In accordance with the inverse care law, providers might prioritise patients according to lowest risk rather than greatest need. Ultimately, at the level of the patient–doctor relationship, trust might be distorted by perceived financial motives.
机译:2013年11月5日,即将离任的国家卫生局(NHS)首席执行官大卫·尼科尔森爵士(David Sir Nicholson)宣布:“私有化和竞争并未证明是成功的”。 NHS已受到越来越多的道德审查。在此,我们假设医疗保健市场在道德上有两个方面的质疑:首先,以目前的形式,医疗保健市场可能会削弱个人自由。目前,英国的委托模式更像批发市场,而不是零售市场,需要委托中间人。而且,每个专员与相当有限的提供者签订合同,从而限制了患者的选择。从理论上讲,提供者可能会竞价获得可观的市场份额,然后在无法涵盖所有​​可能的合同中利用不可避免的摆动空间。根据逆向护理法,提供者可以根据最低风险而不是最大需求来对患者进行优先排序。最终,在患者与医生的关系层次上,信任可能会因感知的经济动机而扭曲。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Lancet》 |2013年第9910期|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号