...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Turning a blind eye to deferasirox's toxicity?
【24h】

Turning a blind eye to deferasirox's toxicity?

机译:对地拉罗司的毒性视而不见?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The European Commission is considering a recommendation by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve the use of deferasirox "in the treatment of chronic iron overload requiring chelation therapy when deferoxamine therapy is contra-indicated or inadequate in patients with non-transfusion-dependent thalassaemias" in addition to transfused thalassaemia patients.The recommendation coincided with the release of a report of 4113 deaths in patients treated with deferasirox.2 Previously, 117% mortality (1935 of 16 514 patients) was reported by the EMA and a warning was issued that deferasirox's toxicity is likely to increase when the maximum recommended dose increases from 30 to 40 mg/kg per day.3 It was also suggested that most of the reported deaths occurred in elderly patients with underlying myelodysplastic syndromes.3 However, a report of individual deaths has revealed that there was indiscriminate and uncontrolled use of deferasirox in many patients of various ages, including many young individuals.4 Of the categories of patients affected from a total of 2474 deaths, there were about 700 with myelodysplastic syndromes, 87 with sickle-cell disease, 77 with haemochromatosis, and ten with thalassaemia.4 Information on the deaths was limited and nonspecific, with about an additional 300 cases generally characterised as patients with iron overload.4 About 500 of the cases seem not to have been related to transfusional iron overload but included patients with cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurological disorders, and other patients with normal iron stores.4 The death rate and indiscriminate use of deferasirox is alarming with regard to the safety for all patients involved, especially since no sufficient or effective safeguards seem to have been implemented so far to reduce toxicity.2A5 Similarly, the reporting in the medical literature of mortality and morbidity including renal, hepatic, and bone-marrow failures during treatment with deferasirox is absent.5 This raises major concerns about the role and practices of the pharmaceutical companies, regulatory authorities, physicians, and others involved in drug safety and the protection of patients' interests.The toxicity and efficacy issues during the development of the generic chelating drugs deferiprone and deferoxamine were more vigorously discussed in the medical literature and were also more transparent than were those for deferasirox. Subsequently, the mortality and morbidity incidence was widely reported and prophylactic measures were taken, which resulted in much lower toxicity outcomes than those reported for deferasirox.
机译:欧盟委员会正在考虑欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的一项建议,以批准在非输血依赖型地中海贫血患者禁忌或不充分使用去铁胺治疗的情况下,在需要螯合疗法的慢性铁超负荷治疗中使用去铁拉索除输血性地中海贫血患者外。该建议与发布使用地拉罗司治疗的患者中4113例死亡的报告相吻合。2此前,EMA报告了117%的死亡率(16 514例患者中的1935例),并发出警告当最大推荐剂量从每天30 mg / kg增加到40 mg / kg时,地拉西罗的毒性可能会增加。3还建议大多数报告的死亡发生在患有基础性增生异常综合征的老年患者中。3然而,有个人死亡报告研究表明,许多年龄段的患者(包括许多其他年轻人。4在总共2474例死亡病例中,约700例患有骨髓增生异常综合症,87例镰状细胞病,77例血色素沉着病和10例地中海贫血。4有关死亡的信息有限且无特异性,另外约300例通常以铁超负荷为特征。4大约500例似乎与输血铁超负荷无关,但包括癌症,心血管疾病和神经系统疾病的患者,以及其他铁正常的患者4地拉罗司的死亡率和不加选择的使用对所有患者的安全性而言是令人震惊的,尤其是因为迄今为止似乎尚未采取足够或有效的措施来降低毒性。2A5同样,医学文献中的报告缺乏地拉罗司治疗期间的死亡率和发病率(包括肾,肝和骨髓衰竭)5。引起人们对制药公司,监管机构,医生以及其他参与药物安全和保护患者利益的角色和实践的主要关注。在通用螯合剂去铁酮和去铁胺的开发过程中,毒性和功效问题更为严重。在医学文献中进行了深入讨论,并且比地拉罗司透明得多。随后,广泛报道了死亡率和发病率,并采取了预防措施,其毒性结果比地拉罗司报道的低得多。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Lancet 》 |2013年第9873期| 共2页
  • 作者

    GJ Kontoghiorghes;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号