首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.
【24h】

Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

机译:急性肺栓塞患者的门诊和住院治疗:一项国际,开放标签,随机,非自卑性试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although practice guidelines recommend outpatient care for selected, haemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism, most treatment is presently inpatient based. We aimed to assess non-inferiority of outpatient care compared with inpatient care. METHODS: We undertook an open-label, randomised non-inferiority trial at 19 emergency departments in Switzerland, France, Belgium, and the USA. We randomly assigned patients with acute, symptomatic pulmonary embolism and a low risk of death (pulmonary embolism severity index risk classes I or II) with a computer-generated randomisation sequence (blocks of 2-4) in a 1:1 ratio to initial outpatient (ie, discharged from hospital /=5 days) followed by oral anticoagulation (>/=90 days). The primary outcome was symptomatic, recurrent venous thromboembolism within 90 days; safety outcomes included major bleeding within 14 or 90 days and mortality within 90 days. We used a non-inferiority margin of 4% for a difference between inpatient and outpatient groups. We included all enrolled patients in the primary analysis, excluding those lost to follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00425542. FINDINGS: Between February, 2007, and June, 2010, we enrolled 344 eligible patients. In the primary analysis, one (0.6%) of 171 outpatients developed recurrent venous thromboembolism within 90 days compared with none of 168 inpatients (95% upper confidence limit [UCL] 2.7%; p=0.011). Only one (0.6%) patient in each treatment group died within 90 days (95% UCL 2.1%; p=0.005), and two (1.2%) of 171 outpatients and no inpatients had major bleeding within 14 days (95% UCL 3.6%; p=0.031). By 90 days, three (1.8%) outpatients but no inpatients had developed major bleeding (95% UCL 4.5%; p=0.086). Mean length of stay was 0.5 days (SD 1.0) for outpatients and 3.9 days (SD 3.1) for inpatients. INTERPRETATION: In selected low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism, outpatient care can safely and effectively be used in place of inpatient care. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, and the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Sanofi-Aventis provided free drug supply in the participating European centres.
机译:背景:尽管实践指南建议对选定的血液动力学稳定的肺栓塞患者进行门诊治疗,但目前大多数治疗以住院患者为基础。我们旨在评估与住院治疗相比门诊治疗的非劣效性。方法:我们在瑞士,法国,比利时和美国的19个急诊室进行了一项开放标签,随机,非劣效性试验。我们以计算机生成的随机序列(初次门诊为1:1)将随机产生的急性,有症状的肺栓塞和低死亡风险(肺栓塞严重度指数风险为I或II级)的患者随机分配给计算机(即随机分组后 / = 5天),然后口服抗凝治疗(> / = 90天)。主要结果是在90天内出现症状性复发性静脉血栓栓塞。安全结局包括14或90天内大出血和90天内死亡。对于住院组和门诊组之间的差异,我们使用4%的非劣效性余量。我们将所有纳入研究的患者包括在内,不包括因随访而丢失的患者。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT00425542。结果:在2007年2月至2010年6月之间,我们招募了344名合格患者。在初步分析中,171名门诊患者中有1名(0.6%)在90天内出现了复发性静脉血栓栓塞,而168名住院患者中没有一名(0.6%的置信上限[UCL] 2.7%; p = 0.011)。每个治疗组中只有一名(0.6%)患者在90天内死亡(95%UCL 2.1%; p = 0.005),而171名门诊患者中有2名(1.2%)在14天内没有大出血(95%UCL 3.6) %; p = 0.031)。到90天时,三名(1.8%)门诊病人但没有住院病人出现大出血(95%UCL 4.5%; p = 0.086)。门诊患者的平均住院天数为0.5天(SD 1.0),住院患者为3.9天(SD 3.1)。解释:在某些低危肺栓塞患者中,可以安全有效地使用门诊代替住院治疗。资金资助:瑞士国家科学基金会,Recherche Clinique计划医院以及美国国家心脏,肺和血液研究所。赛诺菲安万特公司在参与活动的欧洲中心提供了免费药物供应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号