...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Innovation or regulation: IDEAL opportunity for consensus.
【24h】

Innovation or regulation: IDEAL opportunity for consensus.

机译:创新或监管:达成共识的理想机会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the past 30 years, enormous advances in interventional medical devices have affected health care, just as pharmacological innovation did the generation before. Gastric bands, coronary stents, intrauterine devices, and prosthetic joint replacements have greatly improved quality of life for millions. But nothing comes without a cost. Cunlin Wang and colleagues1 noted some of the risks in a study of the paediatric section of the US National Electronic Injury Surveillance System All Injury Program database. More than 144000 adverse events were recorded over 2 years, and during this time nearly 1% of all unintentional injuries to children were caused by implantable or interventional medical devices. These unwanted effects were often unforeseen, bringing into question the processes that develop, evaluate, and regulate such devices.
机译:在过去的30年中,就像药理学创新一样,介入医疗器械的巨大进步也影响了医疗保健。胃束带,冠状动脉支架,子宫内装置和人工关节置换极大地改善了数百万人的生活质量。但是,没有什么是没有代价的。 Cunlin Wang及其同事1在美国国家电子伤害监测系统“所有伤害计划”数据库的儿科部分研究中指出了一些风险。在过去的2年中,共记录了144000多起不良事件,在此期间,近乎1%的儿童意外伤害是由植入式或介入式医疗设备造成的。这些不良影响通常是无法预料的,​​这使开发,评估和调节此类设备的过程产生了疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号