首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study
【24h】

Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study

机译:硼替佐米联合沙利度胺联合地塞米松与沙利度胺联合地塞米松在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤双自体干细胞移植术前诱导治疗和巩固治疗的比较:一项随机的3期研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Thalidomide plus dexamethasone (TD) is a standard induction therapy for myeloma. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of addition of bortezomib to TD (VTD) versus TD alone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.Methods Patients (aged 18-65 years) with previously untreated symptomatic myeloma were enrolled from 73 sites in Italy between May, 2006, and April, 2008, and data collection continued until June 30, 2010. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) by a web-based system to receive three 21-day cycles of thalidomide (100 mg daily for the first 14 days and 200 mg daily thereafter) plus dexamethasone (40 mg daily on 8 of the first 12 days, but not consecutively; total of 320 mg per cycle), either alone or with bortezomib (1-3 mg/m on days 1, 4, 8, and 11). The randomisation sequence was computer generated by the study coordinating team and was stratified by disease stage. After double autologous stem-cell transplantation, patients received two 35-day cycles of their assigned drug regimen, VTD or TD, as consolidation therapy. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete or near complete response to induction therapy. Analysis was by intention to treat. Patients and treating physicians were not masked to treatment allocation. This study is still underway but is not recruiting participants, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01134484, and with EudraCX number 2005-003723-39.
机译:背景沙利度胺加地塞米松(TD)是骨髓瘤的标准诱导疗法。我们的目的是评估在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者中,在双自体干细胞移植之前,将硼替佐米加TD(VTD)与单独TD相比作为单独的TD诱导治疗和合并治疗之后的疗效和安全性。方法患者(年龄18-65岁) )从2006年5月至2008年4月,从意大利的73个地方招募了患有未经治疗的症状性骨髓瘤的患者,数据收集一直持续到2010年6月30日。患者通过基于网络的系统随机分配(比例为1:1)接受三个21天周期的沙利度胺(前14天每天100 mg,其后每天200 mg)和地塞米松(前12天中的8天每天40 mg,但不连续;每个周期总计320 mg),单独或与硼替佐米一起使用(第1、4、8和11天为1-3 mg / m)。随机序列由研究协调小组计算机生成,并按疾病阶段进行分层。在两次自体干细胞移植后,患者接受了两个为期35天的指定药物治疗方案VTD或TD疗程,作为巩固疗法。主要终点是对诱导治疗的完全或接近完全反应的比率。分析是按意向进行的。患者和主治医师并未隐瞒治疗分配。该研究仍在进行中,但并未招募参与者,并且已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT01134484,而EudraCX编号为2005-003723-39。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号