...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Warfarin thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters (WARP): an open-label randomised trial.
【24h】

Warfarin thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters (WARP): an open-label randomised trial.

机译:使用中心静脉导管(WARP)预防癌症患者的华法林血栓预防:一项开放标签的随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The role and dose of anticoagulants in thromboprophylaxis for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy through central venous catheters (CVCs) is controversial. We therefore assessed whether warfarin reduces catheter-related thrombosis compared with no warfarin and whether the dose of warfarin determines the thromboprophylactic effect. METHODS: In 68 clinical centres in the UK, we randomly assigned 1590 patients aged at least 16 years with cancer who were receiving chemotherapy through CVCs to no warfarin, fixed-dose warfarin 1 mg per day, or dose-adjusted warfarin per day to maintain an international normalised ratio between 1.5 and 2.0. Clinicians who were certain of the benefit of warfarin randomly assigned patients to fixed-dose or dose-adjusted warfarin groups. The primary outcome was the rate of radiologically proven, symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN 50312145. FINDINGS: Compared with no warfarin (n=404), warfarin (n=408; 324 [79%] on fixed-dose and 84 [21%] on dose-adjusted) did not reduce the rate of catheter-related thromboses (24 [6%] vs 24 [6%]; relative risk 0.99, 95% CI 0.57-1.72, p=0.98). However, compared with fixed-dose warfarin (n=471), dose-adjusted warfarin (n=473) was superior in the prevention of catheter-related thromboses (13 [3%] vs 34 [7%]; 0.38, 0.20-0.71, p=0.002). Major bleeding events were rare; an excess was noted with warfarin compared with no warfarin (7 vs 1, p=0.07) and with dose-adjusted warfarin compared with fixed-dose warfarin (16 vs 7, p=0.09). A combined endpoint of thromboses and major bleeding showed no difference between comparisons. We did not note a survival benefit in either comparison. INTERPRETATION: The findings show that prophylactic warfarin compared with no warfarin is not associated with a reduction in symptomatic catheter-related or other thromboses in patients with cancer and therefore we should consider newer treatments. FUNDING: Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK.
机译:背景:抗凝剂在通过中心静脉导管(CVC)接受化疗的癌症患者的血栓预防中的作用和剂量是有争议的。因此,我们评估了与没有华法林相比,华法林是否能减少与导管相关的血栓形成,以及华法林的剂量是否决定了血栓预防作用。方法:在英国的68个临床中心,我们随机分配了1590名至少16岁的癌症患者,这些患者通过CVC接受化疗,不使用华法林,每天固定剂量的华法林或每天调整剂量的华法林以维持国际标准化比率在1.5和2.0之间。确信华法令有益处的临床医生将患者随机分配至固定剂量或剂量调整的华法令组。主要结果是影像学证实的,有症状的导管相关血栓形成的发生率。分析是按意向进行的。该试验已注册为国际标准随机对照试验,编号ISRCTN50312145。结果:与未使用华法林(n = 404),华法林(n = 408;固定剂量时分别为324 [79%]和84%[21%]剂量调整后)并未降低导管相关血栓的发生率(24 [6%] vs 24 [6%];相对危险度0.99,95%CI 0.57-1.72,p = 0.98)。但是,与固定剂量的华法林(n = 471)相比,剂量调整后的华法林(n = 473)在预防与导管相关的血栓形成方面效果更好(13 [3%] vs 34 [7%]; 0.38,0.20- 0.71,p = 0.002)。大出血事件很少见;与没有华法林相比,华法林存在过量(7 vs 1,p = 0.07),与固定剂量华法林相比,经剂量调整的华法林存在过量(16 vs 7,p = 0.09)。血栓形成和大出血的合并终点显示比较之间没有差异。在这两个比较中,我们都没有注意到生存优势。解释:研究结果表明,与没有华法林相比,预防性华法林与癌症患者症状性导管相关或其他血栓形成的减少没有相关性,因此我们应考虑采用较新的治疗方法。资金来源:医学研究理事会和英国癌症研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号