...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Maintenance treatment with buprenorphine and naltrexone for heroin dependence in Malaysia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
【24h】

Maintenance treatment with buprenorphine and naltrexone for heroin dependence in Malaysia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机译:在马来西亚,丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮维持治疗对海洛因的依赖:一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Expansion of access to effective treatments for heroin dependence is a worldwide health priority that will also reduce HIV transmission. We compared the efficacy of naltrexone, buprenorphine, and no additional treatment, in patients receiving detoxification and subsequent drug counselling, for maintenance of heroin abstinence, prevention of relapse, and reduction of HIV risk behaviours. METHODS: 126 detoxified heroin-dependent patients, from an outpatient research clinic and detoxification programme in Malaysia, were randomly assigned by a computer-generated randomisation sequence to 24 weeks of manual-guided drug counselling and maintenance with naltrexone (n=43), buprenorphine (n=44), or placebo (n=39). Medications were administered on a double-blind and double-dummy basis. Primary outcomes, assessed by urine testing three times per week, were days to first heroin use, days to heroin relapse (three consecutive opioid-positive urine tests), maximum consecutive days of heroin abstinence, and reductions in HIV risk behaviours over 6 months. The study was terminated after 22 months of enrolment because buprenorphine was shown to have greater efficacy in an interim safety analysis. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00383045. FINDINGS: We observed consistent, linear contrasts in days to first heroin use (p=0.0009), days to heroin relapse (p=0.009), and maximum consecutive days abstinent (p=0.0007), with all results best for buprenorphine and worst for placebo. Buprenorphine was associated with greater time to first heroin use than were naltrexone (hazard ratio 1.87 [95% CI 1.21-2.88]) or placebo (2.02 [1.29-3.16]). With buprenorphine, we also recorded significantly greater time to heroin relapse (2.17 [1.38-3.42]), and maximum consecutive days abstinent than with placebo (mean days 59 [95% CI 43-76] vs 24 [13-35]; p=0.003); however, for these outcomes, differences between buprenorphine and naltrexone were not significant. Differences between naltrexone and placebo were not significant for any outcomes. HIV risk behaviours were significantly reduced from baseline across all three treatments (p=0.003), but the reductions did not differ significantly between the three groups. INTERPRETATION: Our findings lend support to the widespread dissemination of maintenance treatment with buprenorphine as an effective public-health approach to reduce problems associated with heroin dependence.
机译:背景:扩大获得海洛因依赖的有效治疗方法是世界范围内的健康重点,这也将减少艾滋病毒的传播。我们比较了纳曲酮,丁丙诺啡和无其他治疗在接受排毒和随后的药物咨询的患者中维持海洛因戒断,预防复发和减少HIV风险行为的功效。方法:通过计算机生成的随机序列,将来自马来西亚门诊研究诊所和排毒计划的126例排毒海洛因依赖患者随机分配给纳曲酮(n = 43),丁丙诺啡的24个小时的手动指导药物咨询和维持(n = 44)或安慰剂(n = 39)。药物是双盲和双假的。每周接受三次尿液检测评估的主要结局为首次使用海洛因,海洛因复发的天数(连续三次阿片类药物阳性尿液检查),海洛因戒断的最大连续天数以及6个月内HIV风险行为的减少。该研究在入组22个月后终止,因为丁丙诺啡在临时安全性分析中显示出更高的疗效。分析是按意向进行的。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT00383045。结果:我们观察到首次使用海洛因的天数(p = 0.0009),与海洛因复发的天数(p = 0.009)和戒断的最大连续天数(p = 0.0007)的线性一致性一致,所有结果对丁丙诺啡最有利,对丁丙诺啡最差安慰剂。与纳曲酮(危险比1.87 [95%CI 1.21-2.88])或安慰剂(2.02 [1.29-3.16])相比,丁丙诺啡与首次使用海洛因的时间更长。与丁丙诺啡相比,与安慰剂相比,丁丙诺啡的海洛因复发时间(2.17 [1.38-3.42])和戒断的最大连续天数也明显更长(平均59天[95%CI 43-76] vs 24天[13-35]; p = 0.003);然而,对于这些结果,丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮之间的差异并不显着。纳曲酮和安慰剂之间的差异对任何结局均不显着。在所有三种治疗中,HIV危险行为均较基线显着降低(p = 0.003),但在三组之间,这种降低没有显着差异。解释:我们的发现为丁丙诺啡维持治疗的广泛传播提供了支持,这是一种有效的公共卫生方法,可减少与海洛因依赖有关的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号