首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
【24h】

Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

机译:达比加群酯与依诺肝素联合预防全髋关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞的发生:一项随机,双盲,非劣效性试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: After hip replacement surgery, prophylaxis following discharge from hospital is recommended to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism. Our aim was to assess the oral, direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate for such prophylaxis. METHODS: In this double-blind study, we randomised 3494 patients undergoing total hip replacement to treatment for 28-35 days with dabigatran etexilate 220 mg (n=1157) or 150 mg (1174) once daily, starting with a half-dose 1-4 h after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily (1162), starting the evening before surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of total venous thromboembolism (venographic or symptomatic) and death from all causes during treatment. On the basis of the absolute difference in rates of venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin versus placebo, the non-inferiority margin for the difference in rates of thromboembolism was defined as 7.7%. Efficacy analyses were done by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00168818. FINDINGS: Median treatment duration was 33 days. 880 patients in the dabigatran etexilate 220 mg group, 874 in the dabigatran etexilate 150 mg group, and 897 in the enoxaparin group were available for the primary efficacy outcome analysis; the main reasons for exclusion in all three groups were the lack of adequate venographic data. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 60 (6.7%) of 897 individuals in the enoxaparin group versus 53 (6.0%) of 880 patients in the dabigatran etexilate 220 mg group (absolute difference -0.7%, 95% CI -2.9 to 1.6%) and 75 (8.6%) of 874 people in the 150 mg group (1.9%, -0.6 to 4.4%). Both doses were thus non-inferior to enoxaparin. There was no significant difference in major bleeding rates with either dose of dabigatran etexilate compared with enoxaparin (p=0.44 for 220 mg, p=0.60 for 150 mg). The frequency of increases in liver enzyme concentrations and of acute coronary events during the study did not differ significantly between the groups. INTERPRETATION: Oral dabigatran etexilate was as effective as enoxaparin in reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement surgery, with a similar safety profile.
机译:背景:髋关节置换手术后,建议出院后进行预防,以减少静脉血栓栓塞的风险。我们的目的是评估口服凝血酶直接抑制剂达比加群酯的预防效果。方法:在这项双盲研究中,我们将3494例接受全髋关节置换术的患者随机分为28到35天,每天服用一次达比加群酯220 mg(n = 1157)或150 mg(1174),从半剂量开始1手术后-4 h或每天一次皮下注射依诺肝素40 mg(1162),开始于手术前的傍晚。主要疗效结果是总静脉血栓栓塞(静脉造影或有症状的)和治疗期间各种原因导致的死亡的综合结果。基于依诺肝素与安慰剂的静脉血栓栓塞发生率的绝对差异,血栓栓塞发生率差异的非劣效性差被定义为7.7%。通过修改意向治疗进行功效分析。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT00168818。结果:中位治疗时间为33天。达比加群酯220 mg组880例,达比加群酯150 mg组874例,依诺肝素组897例可用于主要疗效分析。三组患者均被排除的主要原因是缺乏足够的静脉造影数据。依诺肝素组897名患者中有60名(6.7%)发生了主要疗效结果,而达比加群酯220 mg组中880名患者中有53名(6.0%)(绝对差异-0.7%,95%CI -2.9至1.6%) 150 mg组中的874人中有75人(占8.6%)(1.9%,-0.6至4.4%)。因此,两种剂量均不低于依诺肝素。两种剂量的达比加群酯与依诺肝素的主要出血率无显着差异(220 mg,p = 0.44,150mg,p = 0.60)。在研究期间,肝酶浓度增加和急性冠脉事件的频率在两组之间没有显着差异。解释:口服达比加群酯依托肝素在减少全髋关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞的风险方面与依诺肝素一样有效,安全性相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号