...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Intensive insecticide spraying for fly control after mass antibiotic treatment for trachoma in a hyperendemic setting: a randomised trial.
【24h】

Intensive insecticide spraying for fly control after mass antibiotic treatment for trachoma in a hyperendemic setting: a randomised trial.

机译:在高流行性环境中对沙眼进行大规模抗生素治疗后,进行强力杀虫喷雾控制飞行:一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: There are no data on the cumulative effect of fly control and antibiotic distribution on trachoma in hyperendemic communities. We sought to determine whether insecticide spray intervention after mass antibiotic treatment could reduce trachoma and ocular infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in hyperendemic neighbourhoods in Tanzania. METHODS: We did a single-blind, randomised clinical trial in 16 neighbourhoods (balozi) in Kongwa, Tanzania. All children aged 1-7 years were enrolled, with 119 children in the eight balozi of the intervention group and 183 in the eight control balozi. Children were examined at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year for clinical trachoma and ocular C trachomatis infection. One dose of azithromycin was offered to all residents of both intervention and control balozi after the baseline survey. Households (and surrounding areas) in the intervention group were then sprayed with insecticide throughout the ensuing year and monitored for reductions in fly counts. This study isregistered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00347763. FINDINGS: The intervention balozi had significantly lower fly counts than controls at all monitored weeks (p<0.05), apart from weeks 7-9. The trachoma rate did not differ significantly in the intervention and control balozi at 6 months post-treatment (20%vs 33%, p=0.07), nor did it at 1 year (43%vs 44%, p=0.90). Infection with C trachomatis did not differ between groups at 6 months post-treatment (9%vs 7%, p=0.45). INTERPRETATION: Intensive insecticide spraying reduced flies in the environment, but our results suggest that fly reduction after mass antibiotic treatment has no added benefit on reduction of trachoma.
机译:背景:目前尚无关于高流行区蝇控制和抗生素分布对沙眼的累积影响的数据。我们试图确定大规模抗生素治疗后的杀虫剂喷雾干预措施是否可以减少坦桑尼亚高流行地区沙眼衣原体的沙眼和眼部感染。方法:我们在坦桑尼亚的Kongwa的16个社区(balozi)中进行了单盲,随机临床试验。纳入所有1-7岁的儿童,其中119名儿童参加了干预组的8个balozi,183名儿童参加了8个对照组的balozi。在基线,6个月和1年时对儿童进行了临床沙眼和眼C沙眼感染的检查。在基线调查后,向所有接受干预和控制巴卢兹治疗的居民均提供一剂阿奇霉素。然后在接下来的一年中,对干预组的家庭(及其周围地区)进行杀虫剂喷洒,并监测果蝇数量的减少。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT00347763。结果发现,在所有监测的星期中,与第7-9周相比,干预性balozi的蝇计数显着低于对照组(p <0.05)。在治疗后6个月,沙眼在干预组和对照组中的沙眼率无显着差异(20%vs 33%,p = 0.07),在1年时也无差异(43%vs 44%,p = 0.90)。两组在治疗后6个月沙眼衣原体感染无差异(9%vs 7%,p = 0.45)。解释:密集的杀虫剂喷洒减少了环境中的苍蝇,但是我们的结果表明,大规模抗生素治疗后减少苍蝇对减少沙眼没有额外的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号