首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Poverty reduction needs both aid and trade.
【24h】

Poverty reduction needs both aid and trade.

机译:减贫既需要援助,也需要贸易。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

2005 was the year poverty reduction became fashionable. Popstars, political figures, and swathes of the charity-giving public all bought into the belief that poverty worldwide could be consigned to history. But last week's annual update of the Commitment to Development Index (CDI)-a composite score for rich countries tracking their commitment to combating poverty by analysing the numerous ways in which government policies can affect poor nations-suggests that actual achievements do not match politicians' new enthusiasm.In fact, according to the CDI, seven rich countries-Switzerland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, and Denmark-have all adopted policy changes that amount to going backwards in their anti-poverty commitments during the past 3 years. These results are intriguing because they come at a time when development aid is steadily climbing: it rose by 31-4% to USdollar106-5 billion in 2005. More curious is that two of the countries with negative progress in the CDI list have achieved aid budgets of 0-7% GDP, the target amountagreed upon by world leaders at the Monterrey Financing for Development Conference in 2002. So if aid is going up, why aren't poor countries benefiting?
机译:2005年是减贫流行的一年。流行歌星,政治人物和慈善团体的群众都相信,世界范围内的贫穷可能被赋予历史。但是,上周的《发展承诺指数》(CDI)年度更新-富国的综合评分,通过分析政府政策可能影响穷国的多种方式来跟踪其与贫困作斗争的承诺-暗示实际成就与政客们不符。事实上,根据CDI的说法,瑞士,法国,德国,荷兰,澳大利亚,新西兰和丹麦等七个富裕国家都采取了政策上的改变,这些改变都等于在反贫困期间做出了反贫困承诺。过去3年。这些结果之所以令人着迷,是因为它们是在发展援助稳步攀升之时提出的:2005年增长了31-4%,达到1060亿美元。国内生产总值预算为0-7%,这是世界各国领导人在2002年蒙特雷发展筹资会议上商定的目标。因此,如果援助增加,那么穷国为什么不从中受益呢?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号