首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Cardiovascular disease prevention with a multidrug regimen in the developing world: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
【24h】

Cardiovascular disease prevention with a multidrug regimen in the developing world: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

机译:在发展中国家采用多种药物预防心血管疾病:成本-效果分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death, with 80% of cases occurring in developing countries. We therefore aimed to establish whether use of evidence-based multidrug regimens for patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease would be cost-effective in low-income and middle-income countries. METHODS: We used a Markov model to do a cost-effectiveness analysis with two combination regimens. For primary prevention, we used aspirin, a calcium-channel blocker, an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, and a statin, and assessed them in four groups with different thresholds of absolute risks for cardiovascular disease. For secondary prevention, we assessed the same combination of drugs in one group, but substituted a beta blocker for the calcium-channel blocker. To compare strategies, we report incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), in US dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). FINDINGS: We recorded that preventive strategies could result in a 2-year gain in life expectancy. Across six developing World Bank regions, primary prevention yielded ICERs of US746-890 dollars/QALY gained for patients with a 10-year absolute risk of cardiovascular disease greater than 25%, and 1039-1221 dollars/QALY gained for those with an absolute risk greater than 5%. ICERs for secondary prevention ranged from 306 dollars/QALY to 388 dollars/QALY gained. INTERPRETATION: Regimens of aspirin, two blood-pressure drugs, and a statin could halve the risk of death from cardiovascular disease in high-risk patients. This approach is cost-effective according to WHO recommendations, and is robust across several estimates of drug efficacy and of treatment cost. Developing countries should encourage the use of these inexpensive drugs that are currently available for both primary and secondary prevention.
机译:背景:心血管疾病是主要的死亡原因,其中80%的病例发生在发展中国家。因此,我们旨在确定在心血管疾病高风险患者中使用循证多药疗法在低收入和中等收入国家是否具有成本效益。方法:我们使用马尔可夫模型对两种组合方案进行了成本效益分析。在一级预防中,我们使用了阿司匹林,钙通道阻滞剂,血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂和他汀类药物,并在具有绝对心血管疾病绝对风险阈值的四个组中对它们进行了评估。对于二级预防,我们在一组中评估了相同的药物组合,但用β受体阻滞剂代替了钙通道阻滞剂。为了比较策略,我们报告了每质量调整生命年(QALY)的美元成本效益比(ICER)。结果:我们记录了预防策略可以使预期寿命增加2年。在六个发展中的世界银行区域中,一次心血管疾病的10年绝对危险度大于25%的患者的初级预防措施获得的ICER为US746-890美元/ QALY,对于绝对风险为10%的患者,其平均ICER为US $ 1039-1221 / QALY大于5%。用于二级预防的ICER从306美元/ QALY到388美元/ QALY不等。解释:阿司匹林,两种降压药和他汀类药物的治疗可使高危患者死于心血管疾病的风险减半。根据WHO的建议,该方法具有成本效益,并且在药物疗效和治疗费用的多个估算中均具有优势。发展中国家应鼓励使用目前可用于一级和二级预防的廉价药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号