...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Re: Safety of the 'drain and retain' option for defunctionalized urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs during artificial urinary sphincter and inflatable penile prosthesis revision surgery: 5-year experience: Editorial comment
【24h】

Re: Safety of the 'drain and retain' option for defunctionalized urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs during artificial urinary sphincter and inflatable penile prosthesis revision surgery: 5-year experience: Editorial comment

机译:回复:在人工导尿括约肌和充气阴茎假体翻修手术中,用于失功能性泌尿外科人工球囊和储液器的“排泄和保留”选项的安全性:5年经验:社论评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I am amazed at how often surgeons opt to chase after uninfected old balloons and reservoirs during revision implant surgery. Why bother? Aside from the tedious nature of the dissection, the potential exists for troublesome vascular and/or abdominal complications during the deep pelvic dissection. This study documents an infection rate of only 1.8% among 55 patients having the old reservoir/balloon emptied and left behind-a rate virtually identical to the 1.5% infection rate among 390 virgin implant cases.
机译:我很惊讶外科医生在翻修植入术中选择追赶未感染的旧气球和储器的频率。何苦?除了解剖的乏味性之外,在骨盆深部解剖期间可能还会出现麻烦的血管和/或腹部并发症。这项研究表明,在55名旧的储液罐/气球被排空并遗留的患者中,感染率仅为1.8%,与390例原生植入病例中的1.5%感染率几乎相同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Journal of Urology》 |2014年第2期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号