首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >A comparison of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for eliminating skin flora before genitourinary prosthetic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

A comparison of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for eliminating skin flora before genitourinary prosthetic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

机译:比较氯己定醇和聚乙烯吡咯烷酮碘在泌尿生殖道修复手术前消除皮肤菌群的比较:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: We defined the relevant skin flora during genitourinary prosthetic surgery, evaluated the safety of chlorhexidine-alcohol for use on the male genitalia and compared chlorhexidine-alcohol to povidone-iodine in decreasing the rate of positive bacterial skin cultures at the surgical skin site before prosthetic device implantation. Materials and Methods: In this single institution, prospective, randomized, controlled study we evaluated 100 consecutive patients undergoing initial genitourinary prosthetic implantation. Patients were randomized to a standard skin preparation with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine-alcohol. Skin cultures were obtained from the surgical site before and after skin preparation. Results: A total of 100 patients were randomized, with 50 in each arm. Pre-preparation cultures were positive in 79% of the patients. Post-preparation cultures were positive in 8% in the chlorhexidine-alcohol group compared to 32% in the povidone-iodine group (p = 0.0091). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most commonly isolated organisms in post-preparation cultures in the povidone-iodine group (13 of 16 patients) as opposed to propionibacterium in the chlorhexidine-alcohol group (3 of 4 patients). Clinical complications requiring additional operations or device removal occurred in 6 patients (6%) with no significant difference between the 2 groups. No urethral or genital skin complications occurred in either group. Conclusions: Chlorhexidine-alcohol was superior to povidone-iodine in eradicating skin flora at the surgical skin site before genitourinary prosthetic implantation. There does not appear to be any increased risk of urethral or genital skin irritation with the use of chlorhexidine compared to povidone-iodine. Chlorhexidine-alcohol appears to be the optimal agent for skin preparation before genitourinary prosthetic procedures. ? 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
机译:目的:我们确定了泌尿生殖外科手术期间的相关皮肤菌群,评估了氯己定醇在男性生殖器上的安全性,并比较了氯己定醇与聚维酮碘在降低手术前皮肤皮肤部位细菌培养阳性率方面的优势。修复装置植入。材料和方法:在这个单一机构中,进行前瞻性,随机,对照研究,我们评估了100名接受初始泌尿生殖系统假体植入的连续患者。患者被随机分配到含聚维酮碘或洗必泰酒精的标准皮肤制剂中。在皮肤准备之前和之后,从手术部位获得皮肤培养物。结果:共有100例患者被随机分组​​,每组50例。预备培养在79%的患者中呈阳性。洗必泰-酒精组的制备后培养阳性率为8%,而聚维酮-碘组为32%(p = 0.0091)。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌是聚维酮-碘组(16名患者中的13名)在制备后培养物中最常分离的生物,而洗必泰-酒精组(4名患者中的3名)则是丙酸杆菌。 6例患者(6%)发生需要额外手术或移除器械的临床并发症,两组之间无显着差异。两组均未发生尿道或生殖器皮肤并发症。结论:氯己定醇在生殖泌尿假体植入前在手术皮肤部位消除皮肤菌群方面优于聚维酮碘。与聚维酮碘相比,使用洗必泰对尿道或生殖器皮肤的刺激似乎没有增加的风险。氯己定醇似乎是泌尿生殖道修复手术之前皮肤准备的最佳制剂。 ? 2013美国泌尿科协会教育与研究公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号