首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Value of Prostate Specific Antigen Density and Percent Free Prostate Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Prognosis
【24h】

Value of Prostate Specific Antigen Density and Percent Free Prostate Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Prognosis

机译:前列腺特异性抗原密度和游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比对前列腺癌预后的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pyrpose; Limited data exist on the relationship of percent free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density with prostate cancer prognosis. Therefore, we compared percent free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density with prostate specific antigen, Gleason sum and stage to predict prostate cancer prognosis in a large cohort using a single prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen assay. Materials and Methods: Between 1999 and 2007 a total of 1,656 patients with prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at the Charite Berlin. There were 322 patients excluded from analysis for a variety of reasons. The final 1,334 patients had prostate specific antigen, free prostate specific antigen, prostate volume and complete pathological analysis available. Results: Median followup was 60.3 months (range 0.2 to 135). Median age (63 years, range 43 to 75) did not differ between the 1,092 patients without and the 242 with biochemical recurrence (p = 0.956), but prostate volume, prostate specific antigen and percent free prostate specific antigen differed significantly (p <0.0001). While prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density increased significantly in patients with Gleason less than 7, 7 and greater than 7 tumors, percent free prostate specific antigen decreased significantly (p <0.0001). Prostate specific antigen, percent free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density differed significantly between pT2 and pT3 tumors, and between patients with vs without positive surgical margins. On univariate analysis Gleason sum, pathological stage, positive surgical margin, total prostate specific antigen, percent free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density were predictors of biochemical recurrence-free survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified Gleason sum, pathological stage, positive surgical margin and prostate specific antigen density as independent predictors of biochemical recurrence-free survival, while percent free prostate specific antigen and total prostate specific antigen failed to be significant. Conclusions: Few models for prostate cancer prognosis include prostate specific antigen density. There is substantial value in prostate specific antigen density but not in percent free prostate specific antigen for improving prostate cancer prognosis and biochemical recurrence prediction.
机译:发怒关于游离前列腺特异性抗原百分数和前列腺特异性抗原密度与前列腺癌预后的关系,存在有限的数据。因此,我们使用单个前列腺特异性抗原和游离前列腺特异性抗原测定法将游离前列腺特异性抗原和前列腺特异性抗原的百分比与前列腺特异性抗原,格里森总数和阶段进行比较,以预测大队列中的前列腺癌预后。材料和方法:在1999年至2007年之间,共有1656例前列腺癌患者在柏林的Charite中心接受了腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术。由于各种原因,有322名患者被排除在分析之外。最后的1,334名患者具有前列腺特异性抗原,游离前列腺特异性抗原,前列腺体积和可用的完整病理分析。结果:中位随访时间为60.3个月(范围0.2至135)。 1,092例无生化复发和242例有生化复发的患者之间的中位年龄(63岁,范围为43至75)没有差异(p = 0.956),但前列腺体积,前列腺特异性抗原和游离前列腺特异性抗原百分率存在显着差异(p <0.0001 )。虽然格里森肿瘤少于7、7和大于7的患者的前列腺特异性抗原和前列腺特异性抗原密度显着增加,但游离前列腺特异性抗原的百分比显着降低(p <0.0001)。前列腺特异性抗原,游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比和前列腺特异性抗原密度在pT2和pT3肿瘤之间以及有或无阳性切缘的患者之间存在显着差异。在单变量分析中,格里森总和,病理分期,阳性手术切缘,总前列腺特异性抗原,游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比和前列腺特异性抗原密度是无生化复发生存的预测指标。多元Cox回归分析确定格里森总和,病理分期,手术切缘阳性和前列腺特异抗原密度是无生化复发生存的独立预测因子,而游离前列腺特异抗原和总前列腺特异抗原的百分比却不显着。结论:很少有前列腺癌预后模型包括前列腺特异性抗原密度。对于改善前列腺癌的预后和生化复发预测,前列腺特异性抗原密度具有实质性价值,而游离前列腺特异性抗原百分数则不具有实质性价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号