首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Re: Assessing the usefulness of delayed imaging in routine followup for renal trauma. P. Davis, M. F. Bultitude, J. Koukounaras, P. L. Royce and N. M. Corcoran. J Urol 2010; 184: 973-977.
【24h】

Re: Assessing the usefulness of delayed imaging in routine followup for renal trauma. P. Davis, M. F. Bultitude, J. Koukounaras, P. L. Royce and N. M. Corcoran. J Urol 2010; 184: 973-977.

机译:回复:评估延迟成像在肾创伤常规随访中的有用性。 P.戴维斯(Davis),M.F.Bultitude,J.Koukounaras,P.L.Royce和N.M.Corcoran。 J Urol 2010; 184:973-977。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor: This article is intriguing, and it brings up many good points on the usefulness of routine renal imaging after initial computerized tomography for renal injury staging. While it is a well-done study, I have concerns regarding some of the conclusions that were derived.The authors state that progression on routine imaging was seen in only 1 of 108 patients, although only 30 patients had grade 4 or 5 injuries. It is common practice to reimage only grade 4 and 5 renal injuries, so the yield of reimaging is 1 of 30 (3.3%), not 1 of 108 (0.9%). Furthermore, of the 7 patients who progressed 5 had grade 3 injuries, 1 grade 4 and 1 grade 5. Again, it is not standard practice to reimage grades 1 to 3.
机译:致编者:这篇文章很有趣,它为最初的计算机X线断层扫描对肾损伤分期后的常规肾成像的实用性提出了许多好处。虽然这项研究做得很好,但我对由此得出的一些结论感到担忧。作者指出,尽管108名患者中有4名或5级受伤,但只有108名患者中有1名患者常规成像进展。通常仅对4级和5级肾脏损伤进行重新成像,因此重新成像的产生率为30分之一(3.3%),而不是108分之一(0.9%)。此外,在进展为5的7名患者中,有3级受伤,其中1级是4级,而1级是5级。同样,重做1至3级图像不是标准做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号