...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Utilization trends at a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic: Initial 5-year experience from the duke prostate center
【24h】

Utilization trends at a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic: Initial 5-year experience from the duke prostate center

机译:多学科前列腺癌诊所的使用趋势:公爵前列腺中心的最初5年经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The multidisciplinary approach is becoming increasingly encouraged but little is known about the multidisciplinary experience compared to routine care. For patients with prostate cancer the goal is to provide evaluations by urologists, medical and radiation oncologists at a single visit. Although additional resources are required, this strategy may enhance the overall health care experience. We compared utilization determinants between a multidisciplinary and a urology prostate cancer clinic at Duke University Medical Center and identified factors associated with pursuing treatment at the university medical center for multidisciplinary clinic patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data on patients referred for primary prostate cancer treatment evaluation at Duke University Medical Center from 2005 to 2009. Comparisons between 701 multidisciplinary clinic and 1,318 urology prostate cancer clinic patients were examined with the rank sum and chi-square tests. Predictive factors for pursuing treatment at the university medical center were assessed using multivariate adjusted logistic regression. Results: Compared to patients at the urology prostate cancer clinic those at the multidisciplinary clinic were more likely to be younger and white, have a higher income and travel a longer distance for evaluation. Of multidisciplinary clinic patients 58% pursued primary treatment at the university medical center. They were more likely to be younger, black and physician referred, have a lower income and reside closer to the medical center. Factors predictive of pursuing treatment at the medical center included high risk disease and physician referral. Factors predictive of not receiving care at the university medical center were income greater than $40,000 and a distance traveled of greater than 100 miles. Conclusions: A different patient demographic is using the multidisciplinary approach. However, when treatment is pursued at the institution providing multidisciplinary services, the patient demographic resembles that of the treating institution.
机译:目的:越来越多地采用多学科方法,但是与常规护理相比,对多学科经验了解甚少。对于前列腺癌患者,目标是在单次就诊时由泌尿科医生,医学和放射肿瘤学家提供评估。尽管需要额外的资源,但是此策略可以增强整体的医疗保健体验。我们在杜克大学医学中心的多学科和泌尿外科前列腺癌诊所之间比较了使用决定因素,并在大学医学中心为多学科诊所的患者确定了与治疗相关的因素。资料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2005年至2009年在杜克大学医学中心进行初次前列腺癌治疗评估的患者的数据。采用秩和和卡方检验对701名多学科诊所和1,318名泌尿科前列腺癌诊所患者进行了比较。 。使用多元调整的Logistic回归评估在大学医学中心寻求治疗的预测因素。结果:与泌尿外科前列腺癌门诊的患者相比,多学科门诊的患者更年轻,更白,收入更高,旅行距离更长。在多学科诊所的患者中,有58%在大学医疗中心接受了初级治疗。他们更有可能是年轻,黑人和医生转诊,收入较低且居住在医疗中心附近。预测在医疗中心接受治疗的因素包括高危疾病和医生转诊。预测无法在大学医疗中心接受治疗的因素包括:收入超过40,000美元,行驶距离超过100英里。结论:不同的患者人群正在使用多学科方法。但是,当在提供多学科服务的机构进行治疗时,患者的人口状况与治疗机构的情况相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号