...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Catheter design for effective manual bladder irrigation.
【24h】

Catheter design for effective manual bladder irrigation.

机译:导管设计可有效进行手动膀胱冲洗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: We compared the efficiency of clearance of a simulated clot from a bladder model using a 6-hole irrigation catheter, a traditional Malecot catheter and a modified Malecot catheter with additional side holes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Latex balloons 12 inches in diameter served as the bladder model. They were filled with 300 cc Jell-O(R) gelatin, which had been partially solidified for 8 hours at 36F. Five manual irrigation/aspiration cycles with a 60 cc catheter tip syringe were performed to remove simulated clot from the bladder models and the amount of clot removed was measured. Five bladder models were used to test the efficiency of clot removal for each 22Fr catheter design, including a standard 22Fr Model 361222 Malecot latex 4-wing catheter (Rusch, High Wycombe, United Kingdom) and a 22Fr Bardex(R) Model 606118-22 latex 6-hole catheter. Two modified versions of the Malecot catheter design involving 2 and 4 additional holes were also tested to determine the effect of a hybrid 6-hole/Malecot design. RESULTS: The 6-hole catheter was more efficient for clot evacuation than the Malecot catheter (p = 0.014). The modified Malecot catheter with 4 additional holes was more efficient than the original Malecot catheter (p = 0.020). However, it was not significantly better than the 6-hole catheter. After 5 irrigation/aspiration cycles 77.0% of residual clot remained in the bladder with the Malecot catheter compared to 60.4% and 54.0% for the 6-hole and modified 4-hole Malecot catheters, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-hole catheter showed an advantage in clot removal over the Malecot catheter design. The enhanced ability of the 6-hole design to remove simulated clot may be attributable to the larger area covered by the holes at the catheter tip. Further investigation to determine the effect of spacing between the holes and the number of holes on the ability to break apart and remove clot is recommended for a more thorough understanding of differences among catheter models and methods of improvement.
机译:目的:我们比较了使用6孔冲洗导管,传统的Malecot导管和改良的Malecot导管(带有附加侧孔)从膀胱模型清除模拟凝块的效率。材料与方法:直径为12英寸的乳胶气球用作膀胱模型。将它们装满300 cc Jell-O明胶,该明胶在36F下已部分固化8小时。使用60 cc导管尖端注射器进行五个手动冲洗/抽吸循环,以从膀胱模型中去除模拟的血块,并测量去除的血块量。五个膀胱模型用于测试每种22Fr导管设计的血块去除效率,包括标准的22Fr 361222型Malecot乳胶4翼导管(Rusch,High Wycombe,英国)和22FrBardex®606118-22型乳胶6孔导管。还测试了涉及2个和4个附加孔的Malecot导管设计的两个修改版本,以确定混合6孔/ Malecot设计的效果。结果:6孔导管疏散血栓的效率比Malecot导管高(p = 0.014)。改良的带有4个附加孔的Malecot导管比原来的Malecot导管更有效(p = 0.020)。但是,它并没有明显优于6孔导管。经过5个冲洗/抽吸循环后,使用Malecot导管的膀胱中残留的血凝块占77.0%,而6孔和改良4孔Malecot导管分别为60.4%和54.0%。结论:6孔导管在去除血栓方面比Malecot导管设计更具优势。 6孔设计去除模拟血块的能力增强,可能是由于导管尖端的孔覆盖了更大的面积。为了更全面地了解导管模型和改进方法之间的差异,建议进一步研究以确定孔之间的间距和孔数对破裂和清除血块的能力的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号