...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of physical chemistry, C. Nanomaterials and interfaces >Simulations of the Quartz(1011)/Water Interface: A Comparison of Classical Force Fields, Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics, and X-ray Reflectivity Experiments
【24h】

Simulations of the Quartz(1011)/Water Interface: A Comparison of Classical Force Fields, Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics, and X-ray Reflectivity Experiments

机译:Quartz(1011)/水界面的仿真:经典力场,从头算分子动力学和X射线反射率实验的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Classical molecular dynamics (CMD) simulations of the (1011) surface of quartz interacting with bulk liquid water are performed using three different classical force fields, Lopes et al., ClayFF, and CHARMM water contact angle (CWCA), and compared to ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) and X-ray reflectivity (XR) results. The axial densities of the water and surface atoms normal to the surface are calculated and compared to previous XR experiments. Favorable agreement is shown for all the force fields with respect to the position of the water atoms. Analyses such as the radial distribution functions between water and hydroxyl atoms and the average cosine of the angle between the water dipole vector and the normal of the surface are also calculated for each force field. Significant differences are found between the different force fields from such analyses, indicating differing descriptions of the structured water in the near vicinity of the surface. AIMD simulations are also performed to obtain the water and hydroxyl structure for comparison among the predictions of the three classical force fields to better understand which force field is most accurate. It is shown that ClayFF exhibits the best agreement with the AIMD simulations for water hydroxyl radial distribution functions, suggesting that ClayFF treats the hydrogen bonding more accurately.
机译:使用Lopes等人,ClayFF和CHARMM水接触角(CWCA)这三种不同的经典力场,对石英(1011)与大量液态水相互作用的(1011)表面进行了经典分子动力学(CMD)模拟,并将其与从头算起进行了比较。分子动力学(AIMD)和X射线反射率(XR)结果。计算了水和垂直于表面的表面原子的轴向密度,并将其与以前的XR实验进行了比较。对于所有力场,相对于水原子的位置都显示出有利的一致性。还针对每个力场计算分析,例如水和羟基原子之间的径向分布函数以及水偶极子矢量与表面法线之间的平均角度余弦。通过这种分析,在不同的力场之间发现了显着差异,表明对表面附近结构水的描述不同。还执行AIMD仿真以获得水和羟基结构,以便在三个经典力场的预测之间进行比较,以更好地了解哪个力场最准确。结果表明,ClayFF与AIMD模拟在水羟基径向分布函数方面表现出最好的一致性,这表明ClayFF更准确地处理了氢键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号