...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of physical chemistry, A. Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory >An assessment of theoretical procedures for predicting the thermochemistry and kinetics of hydrogen abstraction by methyl radical from benzene
【24h】

An assessment of theoretical procedures for predicting the thermochemistry and kinetics of hydrogen abstraction by methyl radical from benzene

机译:评估预测甲基从苯中提取氢的热化学和动力学的理论方法的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The reaction enthalpy (298 K), barrier (0 K), and activation energy and preexponential factor (600-800 K) have been examined computationally for the abstraction of hydrogen from benzene by the methyl radical, to assess their sensitivity to the applied level of theory. The computational methods considered include high-level composite procedures, including W1, G3-RAD, G3(MP2)-RAD, and CBS-QB3, as well as conventional ab initio and density functional theory (DFT) methods, with the latter two classes employing the 6-31G(d), 6-31+G(d, p) and/or 6-311+G(3df, 2p) basis sets, and including ZPVE/thermal corrections obtained from 6-31G(d) or 6-31+G(d, p) calculations. Virtually all the theoretical procedures except UMP2 are found to give geometries that are suitable for subsequent calculation of the reaction enthalpy and barrier. For the reaction enthalpy, W1, G3-RAD, and URCCSD(T) give best agreement with experiment, while the large-basis-set DFT procedures slightly underestimate the endothermicity. The reaction barrier is slightly more sensitive to the choice of basis set and/or correlation level, with URCCSD(T) and the low-cost BMK method providing values in close agreement with the benchmark G3-RAD value. Inspection of the theoretically calculated rate parameters reveals a minor dependence on the level of theory for the preexponential factor. There is more sensitivity for the activation energy, with a reasonable agreement with experiment being obtained for the G3 methods and the hybrid functionals BMK, BB1K, and MPW1K, especially in combination with the 6-311+G(3df, 2p) basis set. Overall, the high-level G3-RAD composite procedure, URCCSD(T), and the cost-effective DFT methods BMK, BB1K, and MPW1K give the best results among the methods assessed for calculating the thermochemistry and kinetics of hydrogen abstraction by the methyl radical from benzene.
机译:通过计算检查了反应焓(298 K),势垒(0 K)以及活化能和指数前因子(600-800 K),以从甲基中提取苯中的氢,以评估其对应用水平的敏感性理论。考虑的计算方法包括高级组合过程,包括W1,G3-RAD,G3(MP2)-RAD和CBS-QB3,以及常规的从头算和密度泛函理论(DFT)方法,后两种方法采用6-31G(d),6-31 + G(d,p)和/或6-311 + G(3df,2p)基础集,并包括从6-31G(d)获得的ZPVE /热校正或6-31 + G(d,p)计算。几乎所有的理论程序(除UMP2之外)都可以找到适合于随后计算反应焓和势垒的几何形状。对于反应焓,W1,G3-RAD和URCCSD(T)与实验最吻合,而大基数DFT程序则低估了吸热性。反应障碍对基集和/或相关水平的选择更为敏感,URCCSD(T)和低成本BMK方法提供的值与基准G3-RAD值非常一致。对理论计算的速率参数的检查表明,该指数因子对理论水平的依赖性较小。活化能具有更高的灵敏度,与G3方法以及BMK,BB1K和MPW1K杂合功能的实验获得了合理的吻合,尤其是与6-311 + G(3df,2p)基础组合使用时。总体而言,在评估用于计算通过甲基提取氢的热化学和动力学的方法中,高级的G3-RAD复合方法URCCSD(T)和经济高效的DFT方法BMK,BB1K和MPW1K给出了最佳结果。来自苯的自由基。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号