首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Chemical Physics >Dynamics of capillary condensation in lattice gas models of confined fluids: A comparison of dynamic mean field theory with dynamic Monte Carlo simulations
【24h】

Dynamics of capillary condensation in lattice gas models of confined fluids: A comparison of dynamic mean field theory with dynamic Monte Carlo simulations

机译:密闭流体晶格气体模型中的毛细冷凝动力学:动态平均场理论与动态蒙特卡洛模拟的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article addresses the accuracy of a dynamic mean field theory (DMFT) for fluids in porous materials [P. A. Monson, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 084701 (2008)]. The theory is used to study the relaxation processes of fluids in pores driven by step changes made to a bulk reservoir in contact with the pore. We compare the results of the DMFT to those obtained by averaging over large numbers of dynamic Monte Carlo (DMC) simulation trajectories. The problem chosen for comparison is capillary condensation in slit pores, driven by step changes in the chemical potential in the bulk reservoir and involving a nucleation process via the formation of a liquid bridge. The principal difference between the DMFT results and DMC is the replacement of a distribution of nucleation times and location along the pore for the formation of liquid bridges by a single time and location. DMFT is seen to yield an otherwise qualitatively accurate description of the dynamic behavior.
机译:本文讨论了多孔材料中流体的动态平均场理论(DMFT)的准确性[P. A.Monson,J.Chem。物理128,084701(2008)]。该理论用于研究孔隙中流体的弛豫过程,该过程是由对与孔隙接触的大体积储层的阶跃变化驱动的。我们将DMFT的结果与通过对大量动态蒙特卡洛(DMC)模拟轨迹求平均而获得的结果进行比较。选择进行比较的问题是狭缝孔中的毛细管凝结,这是由大容量储层中化学势的阶跃变化驱动的,并且涉及通过形成液桥的成核过程。 DMFT结果与DMC之间的主要区别在于,成核时间和沿孔的位置分布仅用一次时间和位置即可代替,以形成液桥。 DMFT被认为可以对动态行为进行定性的精确描述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号