首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Chemical Physics >Response to “Comment on ‘Can existing models qualitatively describe the mixing behavior of acetone-water mixtures?’”
【24h】

Response to “Comment on ‘Can existing models qualitatively describe the mixing behavior of acetone-water mixtures?’”

机译:对“关于“现有模型能否定性描述丙酮-水混合物的混合行为?”的评论”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In their comment~1 Kang, Perera, and Smith raise doubts about the conclusion of our recent study~2 that the KBFF model of acetone and SPC/E water does not mix with each other below the acetone mole fraction of about 0.28. Their criticism is based on two major arguments. First, they question the validity, or, at least, the applicability of the method we used to detect immiscibility (more precisely, the method we used to determine the second derivative of the excess free energy of mixing, see Eq. 7 of Ref. 3 and Eq. 11 of Ref. 2, a thermodynamic quantity that is indicative of immiscibility). Second, they question the validity of our results by claiming that we obtained positive energy of mixing values in the acetone mole fraction range of 0–0.26, while both Weerasinghe and Smith~3 and Perera and Sokoli~4 obtained previously negative values for this quantity.
机译:在他们的评论中,[1] Kang,Perera和Smith对我们最近的研究结论[2]提出了怀疑,即丙酮和SPC / E水的KBFF模型在丙酮摩尔分数约为0.28以下时不会相互混合。他们的批评基于两个主要论点。首先,他们质疑我们用于检测不混溶性的方法的有效性,或者至少是其适用性(更确切地说,是我们用于确定混合多余自由能的二阶导数的方法,请参见参考文献7)。 3和参考文献2的等式11,表示不溶混性的热力学量)。其次,他们声称我们在丙酮摩尔分数范围为0-0.26的情况下获得了正混合能值,而Weerasinghe和Smith〜3以及Perera和Sokoli〜4此前都获得了该值的负值,从而质疑了结果的正确性。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号