首页> 外文期刊>Crop Protection >Laboratory evaluation of diatomaceous earth deposits mined from several locations in central and southeastern Europe as potential protectants against coleopteran grain pests.
【24h】

Laboratory evaluation of diatomaceous earth deposits mined from several locations in central and southeastern Europe as potential protectants against coleopteran grain pests.

机译:从欧洲中部和东南部几个地点开采的硅藻土沉积物的实验室评估,可作为抵抗鞘翅目谷物害虫的潜在保护剂。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Diatomaceous earth (DE) deposits from regions of central and southeastern Europe were evaluated for their insecticidal efficacy against Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) and Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in comparison with the commercially available DE formulation SilicoSec. The effects of temperature, RH, grain commodity (wheat, barley, maize, rice), application method (spraying vs. dusting) were evaluated. FYROM, a DE from the Former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia, was the most effective of the DE deposits for grain treatment, whereas the least effective was from Greece (named Crete). However, for surface treatment, Slovenia was the most effective followed by Elassona 1 and Begora. Increase of temperature increased DE efficacy, while the reverse was noted with the increase of RH. Furthermore, the DEs were more effective in barley or wheat than in maize or rice. Neither the mined DEs nor SilicoSec were able to suppress progeny production of the tested species after previous exposure on the treated commodities. Generally, dust application of DEs was more efficacious than spraying against S. oryzae and T. confusum. However, spraying of wheat significantly reduced the bulk density (test weight) compared to dusting. For surface treatment, after 1 d of exposure, Slovenia was the most effective of the mined DEs followed by Elassona 1 and Begora, whereas after 6 d of exposure the mortality was almost complete (>99%) with all three DEs. More than 6 d of exposure were required for an effective control of T. confusum adults with the remainder of the mined DEs.
机译:评价了欧洲中部和东南部地区的硅藻土(DE)沉积物对米曲霉(Siophilus oryzae)(L.)(鞘翅目:Curculionidae),杜鹃花(Rhyzopertha dominica)(f )(鞘翅目:Bostrychidae)和 Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val(鞘翅目:Tenebrionidae)与市售DE制剂SilicoSec进行比较。评估了温度,相对湿度,谷物商品(小麦,大麦,玉米,大米),施用方法(喷雾与撒粉)的影响。前南斯拉夫的马其顿共和国的DE,FYROM是最有效的谷物处理DE矿床,而效果最差的是希腊(称为克里特岛)。但是,对于表面处理,斯洛文尼亚是最有效的,其次是Elassona 1和Begora。温度升高可提高DE功效,而相对湿度随RH升高则相反。此外,DEs在大麦或小麦中比在玉米或水稻中更有效。在事先暴露于处理过的商品之后,开采的DE和SilicoSec都无法抑制被测物种的后代生产。通常,DEs的粉尘施用比喷洒iS更有效。稻米和 T。 confusum 。然而,与撒粉相比,喷洒小麦显着降低了堆密度(测试重量)。对于表面处理,在暴露1天后,斯洛文尼亚是开采的DE中最有效的,其次是Elassona 1和Begora,而暴露6天后,所有三个DE的死亡率几乎完全(> 99%)。有效控制iT需要超过6 d的暴露时间。将成人与剩余的DE一起使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号