首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Biopsy criteria for determining appropriateness for active surveillance in the modern era
【24h】

Biopsy criteria for determining appropriateness for active surveillance in the modern era

机译:确定现代主动监测是否适当的活检标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To evaluate algorithms to predict insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods Five hundred and fifty men (410 Caucasian, 100 African American [AA], and 40 others) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level 10 ng/dL, T1c, 12-core biopsy, and biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 were categorized into training and validation sets. Six biopsy algorithms were tested for predicting insignificant (0.5 cm3, organ confined, and Gleason score ≤6) cancer at RP. Cancers incorrectly predicted to be insignificant were ranked into 4 groups of increasing aggressiveness. Results Original (Gleason score 6, PSA density ≤0.15, 2 positive cores, and maximum core involvement ≤50%) and modified Epstein criteria (Gleason score 6, PSA density ≤0.15, 2 positive cores, and unilateral cancer) had the highest negative predictive values - correct classification of insignificant cancer. Among cancers predicted to be insignificant in Caucasians, 29.9% cases using the original and 27% cases using the modified Epstein criteria had significant cancer at RP. However, more adverse findings at RP were misclassified as insignificant in only 3.5% and 2.2% of cases using the original and modified Epstein criteria, respectively. Of cancers predicted insignificant in AA men, 54.1% cases using the original and 51.6% cases using the modified Epstein criteria were misclassified as insignificant. Dominant anterior tumors were seen in 117 Caucasian (28.5%) and 44 AA men (44%). Conclusion The Epstein criteria maintain their accuracy in the modern era with extended biopsy sampling. The negative predictive values are lower in AA men, in part due to higher frequency of anterior tumors, where multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be recommended in AAs considering surveillance.
机译:目的评估前列腺癌根治术(RP)时可预测的微不足道前列腺癌的算法。方法550名男性(410名高加索人,100名非裔美国人[AA]和40名其他人)的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平<10 ng / dL,T1c,12针活检和格里森评分3 + 3 = 6被分类为训练和验证集。测试了六种活检算法,以预测RP时微不足道的癌症(0.5 cm3,器官受限,格里森评分≤6)。被错误地预测为无关紧要的癌症被分为4组,其侵略性不断增强。结果原始(格里森评分6,PSA密度≤0.15,2个阳性核心,最大核心受累≤50%)和改良的爱泼斯坦标准(格里森评分6,PSA密度≤0.15,2个阳性核心,单侧癌)具有最高的阴性率预测值-对微小癌症的正确分类。在预计对白种人无影响的癌症中,使用原始的29.9%的病例和使用改良的爱泼斯坦标准的27%的病例在RP时有明显的癌症。但是,分别使用原始和修改的爱泼斯坦标准,仅在3.5%和2.2%的病例中,RP的更多不良发现被误认为微不足道。在AA男性中预计微不足道的癌症中,使用原始的54.1%的病例和使用修改的Epstein标准的51.6%的病例被错误分类为微不足道。在117名高加索人(占28.5%)和44名AA男性(占44%)中发现了明显的前部肿瘤。结论爱泼斯坦标准通过扩大活检样本在现代保持了其准确性。 AA男性的阴性预测值较低,部分原因是前部肿瘤的发生频率较高,因此在考虑监测的AA中应建议多参数磁共振成像。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号