首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Difference in operative time according to stone location for endoscopic management of ureteral and renal stones
【24h】

Difference in operative time according to stone location for endoscopic management of ureteral and renal stones

机译:内镜处理输尿管和肾结石的手术时间因结石部位而异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To study the difference in operative time for endoscopic management of ureteral and renal stones according to the stone location. Materials and Methods: We hypothesized that these cases are not equivalent in terms of the surgeon's work as measured by the operating time, and we assessed whether significant variations exist within the umbrella of the Common Procedural Terminology code 52353: "ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy." We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients undergoing unilateral ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery under the care of 1 fellowship-trained endourologist from 2008 to 2010. The patients who underwent simultaneous additional endoscopic procedures, including bilateral ureteropyeloscopy, were excluded. The demographics, stone size and location, presence of a previously placed stent, and operative time were assessed and compared. The cohorts were designated according to the stone location - ureteral or renal. Results: Of the total 213 ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery cases reviewed, 115 were ureteral stones and 98 were renal stones. The renal stones required a significantly increased mean operative time (112 minutes) than did the ureteral stones (70 minutes; P <.001). The renal stone size was significantly larger (11.3 vs 7.7 mm, P <.001), and these cases had a greater preoperative stent rate (55% vs 37%, P =.014). Conclusion: Despite bundling within a single Current Procedural Terminology code, endoscopic management of renal stones and ureteral stones were markedly different, with a significant increase in the operative time for renal stones. The renal stone size was significantly larger, as expected. Current Procedural Terminology differentiation should be considered to appreciate the difference between ureteral and renal ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy in terms of resource requirements. ? 2013 Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
机译:目的:研究根据结石位置进行内镜治疗输尿管和肾结石的手术时间的差异。材料和方法:我们假设这些病例在手术时间方面与外科医生的工作并不相同,并且我们评估了通用程序术语代码52353(“输尿管镜碎石术”)的范围内是否存在显着差异。我们回顾性回顾了2008年至2010年在一名接受过研究金培训的内分泌科医生的护理下接受单侧输尿管镜激光碎石术或逆行肾内手术的所有患者的记录。排除了同时接受其他内镜手术(包括双侧输尿管镜检查)的患者。对人口统计学,结石大小和位置,先前放置的支架的存在以及手术时间进行了评估和比较。根据结石部位(输尿管或肾脏)指定队列。结果:在总共213例输尿管镜激光碎石术和逆行肾内手术病例中,输尿管结石115例,肾结石98例。肾结石所需的平均手术时间(112分钟)比输尿管结石(70分钟; P <.001)显着增加。肾结石尺寸明显更大(11.3 vs 7.7 mm,P <.001),这些病例的术前支架率更高(55%vs 37%,P = .014)。结论:尽管捆绑在一个现行的手术术语代码中,但肾结石和输尿管结石的内窥镜治疗明显不同,肾结石的手术时间显着增加。肾结石的大小明显大于预期。应考虑当前的程序术语区分,以了解在资源需求方面输尿管和肾输尿管镜碎石术之间的差异。 ? 2013 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Urology》 |2013年第3期|共5页
  • 作者

    DetersL.A.; PaisJr.V.M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号