...
首页> 外文期刊>Physical Review, A. Atomic, molecular, and optical physics >Macroscopic locality with equal bias reproduces with high fidelity a quantum distribution achieving the Tsirelson's bound
【24h】

Macroscopic locality with equal bias reproduces with high fidelity a quantum distribution achieving the Tsirelson's bound

机译:具有相等偏差的宏观局部以高保真度复制达到Tsirelson界的量子分布

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two physical principles, macroscopic locality (ML) and information causality (IC), so far have been most successful in distinguishing quantum correlations from post-quantum correlations. However, there are also some post-quantum probability distributions which cannot be distinguished with the help of these principles. Thus, it is interesting to see whether consideration of these two principles, separately, along with some additional physically plausible constraints, can explain some interesting quantum features which are otherwise hard to reproduce. In this paper we show that in a Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenario, ML along with the constraint of equal bias for the concerned observables, almost reproduces the quantum joint probability distribution corresponding to a maximal quantum Bell violation, which is unique up to relabeling. From this example and earlier work of Cavalcanti, Salles, and Scarani, we conclude that IC and ML are inequivalent physical principles; satisfying one does not imply that the other is satisfied.
机译:迄今为止,两种物理原理(宏观局部性(ML)和信息因果关系(IC))在区分量子相关性和后量子相关性方面最为成功。但是,还有一些量子后的概率分布,无法借助这些原理加以区分。因此,有趣的是,分别考虑这两个原理以及一些其他在物理上似乎合理的约束是否可以解释一些有趣的量子特征,而这些量子特征否则将很难重现。在本文中,我们表明在Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt场景中,ML以及相关可观察物的等偏约束都几乎再现了与最大量子Bell违规对应的量子联合概率分布,这是唯一的直到重新贴标签。从这个例子以及Cavalcanti,Salles和Scarani的早期工作中,我们得出结论,IC和ML是不等价的物理原理。满足一个条件并不意味着另一个条件得到满足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号